Jump to content

Talk:HMS King Edward VII

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleHMS King Edward VII has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starHMS King Edward VII is part of the Predreadnought battleships of the Royal Navy series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 15, 2019Good article nomineeListed
August 23, 2020Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

Did not have 6 inch guns in casemates?

[edit]

The text states this class did not have its 6-inch guns in casemates. But the photos show what looks to me like 6-inch guns in casemates along the side. ?? Rcbutcher (talk) 02:30, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on HMS King Edward VII. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:41, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:HMS King Edward VII/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 07:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Zawed (talk) 07:10, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

  • OK, no issues identified

Infobox

  • Formatting issue here: Barbettes: 12&nbspin
    • Good catch

Design

  • Beam dimension doesn't match infobox
    • Must've been a typo
  • The armour thickness dimensions include conversions to mm although the infobox conversions are to cm
    • Fixed

Service history

  • "subsequently participated in a blockade by an international force of Montenegro and in an occupation of Scutari to force the Macedonians to relinquish the city to the newly-formed Albania"; suggest "subsequently participated, as part of an international force, in a blockade of Montenegro..." for clarity
    • Works for me

Notes/References/Further reading

  • No oclc for Jellicoe?
    • Added
  • Most of the book citations format for further reading don't match the references. specifically date of publication presentation. Also no isbn for Gibbons
    • Have updated these.

Other stuff

  • Image tags look OK
  • One dupe link: destroyer (see final section)
    • Fixed
  • No dablinks
  • External links check out OK although in the external links section it says one is broken. That one works fine for me.
    • Works for me too - I'll remove the note

Will check back in a few days. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 01:12, 13 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Zawed. Parsecboy (talk) 15:36, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good Parsecboy. I just notice the isbns are formatted inconsistency but won't hold up passing this as GA for that. You will want to get it sorted before going to ACR though. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I'll get to those too. Parsecboy (talk) 12:35, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New Brighton

[edit]

The caption for the photo passing New Brighton says it's in Canada, but it's clearly of New Brighton on the Mersey. What's the best way to word the caption. Merseyside doesn't sound right for the era. Maybe just 'New Brighton, River Mersey'? BPMullins | Talk 03:08, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Huh - that's what you get for following the caption from the archive. One wonders how they confused a small, unincorporated settlement in BC for a fairly large metro area. And that tower is fairly recognizable. Parsecboy (talk) 14:24, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the sinking

[edit]

I have a picture of the King Edward VII during the sinking taken from the deck of the OWL. this is the original photograph with the description of the sinking including time date longitude and latitude. 2600:100F:A013:B9DA:910C:8C55:D6DD:474 (talk) 04:25, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:HMS_King_Edward_VII&oldid=1213118627"