User talk:Bpmullins

User talk:Bpmullins/Archive

Welcome!

Hello, Bpmullins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rklawton 01:54, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Calendar of saints (Church of the Province of Melanesia

Hi! Thanks for adding Calendar of saints (Church of the Province of Melanesia to your project's work queue. You may want to move the article to a better named page. I noticed that the current article is missing the closing paranthesis in its name. regards. -- Whpq 21:24, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 2

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 October 2 because of your original comments and knowledge of Cargenie works. --Arbusto 07:37, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Right Reverend S. Arthur Huston

He was my grandfather. During his lifetime he detested the nickname of "Sim" and always styled himself "S. Arthur Huston." I'm prepared to create a redirection if that proves necessary.

Have you consulted the files at San Joaquin Apostolic Succession?

Herb Huston 14:39, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Holy Ghost baptism

Hi - I just thought I'd make contact with you about that article, and basically say hi! I went to it seeing it tagged as a CSD G1 (which it was), but an AfD had been opened on it by another admin, which based on the two !votes there, I quickly closed (citing WP:SNOW as the AfD had only been up for a few minutes). I hope this clears the air, and appreciate the ambiguity of such a quickly-closed AfD! Thanks M a rtinp23 20:53, 20 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anglicanism COTM

The Anglicanism Collaboration of the Month has been reactivated! Please consider going to the page to either vote for one of the nominated articles, or nominate one yourself. Thanks! Fishhead64 02:55, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Succession of Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States

Hi, I had a feeling I'd be hearing from you, since I looked at the history of the article before I dove in. When I looked at the article and saw so many blanks, I figured I'd update it, since I have an Episcopal Church Annual at home (2001, unfortunately, as that's when I left the church's employ). When I saw that you're actively adding names, I figured I'd go back and add things you didn't have. But I don't have time for this! Wikipedia is becoming addicting! I have to limit myself to one or two dioceses a night. The Red Book has the list of each diocese's previous bishops, so I figured I'd go through and identify them as II Alabama, etc., where they aren't already. Take care. Ed (InkQuill 15:39, 8 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

OK, B.P., how does anyone get Ed Browning as the 8th bishop of Hawaii if they just elected their 5th? (Do you find it as odd as I that we have to have conversations on each other's talk page? I find it very disconnected.) InkQuill 20:32, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've wondered what happens if two people try editing the same article at the same time. I had hoped that the system would block the second person. Actually, it may just be a fluke. I had computer problems last night--when I open Adobe Acrobat in Firefox it sometimes freezes my laptop. I thought I was going to lose everything I did (which was scattered throughout the article) but I was able to get back to it and save. I'll take a look when I get a chance. Ed (InkQuill 15:41, 23 February 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Changed names of dioceses

I moved this conversation to the Succession of Episcopal bishops' talk page. InkQuill 21:05, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite betrayal criterion

Why on earth would you want to delete this? It is clearly notable.--Fahrenheit451 22:17, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Conversion of units

Hi - on this page the bot 'corrected' cental to central. Ordinarily no problem, but in this case the unit of measure really is a cental. -- BPMullins | Talk 01:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that. Another user, Rhialto already pointed it out to me, and I've made a note of it so it won't happen again. Cheers, CmdrObot 17:53, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Notability (people)#Regarding notability of Football (soccer) players

Hi, seeing you have been involved in previous Afd debates on the subject I invite you to contribute to this discussion to clarify certain issues about football player notability. I think clearer guidelines are needed to avoid repeated inappropriate nominations for deletion and time consuming discussions. Cheers! StephP 22:23, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alekhine's defense, Modern variation, 4...Bg4

Hi, you commented at this AfD that my nomination was too broad, but you did not clarify why. They are all clearly on the same subject, and the differences between the pages are slight at best. In fact, I'd say the whole category is rife with the same problem, but since I do agree that would be far too large a nomination I refrained from doing that. Instead, I tried to pick a fair variety of pages so that folks could get some idea of the scope of the category and so that I could get some idea of what pages to nominate on further reviews of the category and what to merely tag for clean up. Do you feel I nominated too many at once, or is there some difference in the pages I'm not seeing? Yes, I do know that some are referenced, with a brief mention of some minor history, and some are nothing but listings of moves, but over all, I do not consider that difference as enough to warrant closing the nomination. Each page can be weighed on its own merits, and the numbers are not too high, nor is the subject too different for any kind of discussion to develop.

In any case, I'd still like to know what you think constitutes a page worth keeping and what kind of page is worth deleting. The category of Chess openings has a 196 pages. I've tried for a while to get some clean up going without an AfD, but there has been no sign of it happening, so I feel I'm going to have to do it myself. But with that large a number, I do feel a need for feedback before continuing, and I do feel that I'm going to have to bundle more in the future. So if you could just help me figure out a good course of action to take I'd be much obliged for your aid. FrozenPurpleCube 17:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And BTW, your signature refers to BPmullins which is different from Bpmullins. You might want to fix that. FrozenPurpleCube 17:45, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Favorite betrayal criterion (3rd nomination)

Please support this this AfD. Yellowbeard 11:20, 6 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi BP. Thanks for undoing the vandalism. Of the pages on my watchlist, Toni Morrison seems to get hit a lot.

I noticed with some sadness you left the Succession project. I hope you didn't feel bullied by the way I was doing it. Last night I finshed one phase--I've identified all the bishops in each diocese as far as I'm able. My Red Book is 2001, so I can't add consecrators to the newer bishops, and some dioceses remain blank probably because they're now part of Mexico.

I really shouldn't spend so much time on this, but I'd like to do more bishop bios and upgrade diocesan pages to have similar formats, categories, include lists of bishops, etc.

What do you think? Where's your energy going? InkQuill 23:05, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've got less editing time right now. It's not that I left the Succession page, but my Red Book is even older than yours so I had less to offer. And you were doing such a good job that it seemed best to let you do it your way.

The idea of working for a common format in diocesan pages sounds like a good project. If you'd like to start working on that I'd be happy to help. -- BPMullins | Talk 04:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I just looked at your talk page because I was wondering why you hadn't answered my post! I guess you weren't on my watch list, so I never knew you replied!

As for diocese pages, I've been using Connecticut as a template, but there may be a better way. For example, I took the format for the list of bishops from some other diocesan page, but listing a bishop three times if he/she serves as a suffragan, coadjutor and diocesan doesn't seem quite right. I also don't know if there are additional categories or other things that should be included. Probably there's a template for an info box, or one should be created, but that's beyond me. I'm going to edit Rhode Island tonight, but I don't want to get as caught up as I was with the succession list--I've gotten way behind in doing ancient things, like reading the newspaper! InkQuill 02:18, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Educational film AfD

Hi, you recently attempted to nominate Educational film for deletion. There appears to be a bug in Twinkle that is currently being worked on that prevented the script from completing the process. Another editor has since removed the afd tag from the article -- I just thought I'd let you know in case you hadn't noticed yet and wanted to nominate the article again. Cheers S ^up? 22:47, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Smile

Marlith ^T/C has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith ^T/C 17:56, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anglican collaboration of the month

The current Anglicanism collaboration effort is St. Luke's Church (Smithfield, Virginia)

Voting for the next collaboration is going on now. (Vote here)

Wassupwestcoast 02:51, 4 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Melt the clouds of sin and sadness drive thedark of doubt away!

Marlith ^T/C hopes that you are joyful! Joy promotes WikiLove and hopefully this little bit has helped make your day better. Spread the Wikilove by melting the clouds of sin and sadness that weigh down someone else. Try to brighten the day of as many people as you can! Keep up the great editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Joy message}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Marlith ^T/C 04:22, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Konstakuten

An article that you have been involved in editing, Konstakuten, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstakuten (2nd nomination). Thank you.

(You voted on the last AfD, hence the notice.) --B. Wolterding 17:32, 18 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Johnstone Burgh

While it is true the majority of this league are U-15 it is the best league of its kind with all the teams taking part being of a decent standard & the best of them feed players through to profesional teams country (such as Celtic, Aberdeen & Dundee United). This league notable as it is not just teams from near the town of Paisley as the name sugests, it include teams such as Oban Saints, who for an away game have to travel for at least 3 hours to play the team most local to them. This is becuase the P&D league takes only the best teams from this district. All the teams in this league are notable but I have chosen Johnstone Burgh because of their success in the blackpool tournament & because while other teams are declining The Burgh are getting better & better. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DLB 4 eva (talk • contribs) 16:26, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four Holy Marshals

Thank you! I found a reference to them by chance while working on the Quirinus of Neuss article. I'm trying to find more on this fascinating subject. I appreciate your message! Best --Polylerus (talk) 22:09, 29 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Christianity

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Christianity

The goal of WikiProject Christianity is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Christianity available on Wikipedia. WP:X as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Christianity, but prefers that all Christian traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

- Tinucherian (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Paul Bunyan. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Merenta (talk) 13:53, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature is broken

Hi there - I noticed a comment by you on another page, and I just thought I should point this out in case you weren't aware: your signature isn't working properly. The first part links to your user page, but the second part links to the nonexistent User talk:BPmullins instead of User talk:Bpmullins (this page). You can fix this by going to Special:Preferences and altering the 'signature' field; for more information, see WP:Signatures#Customizing your signature. Robofish (talk) 13:42, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dean

Hi. You made this edit in which you removed links to Dean Guitars and Dean Foods from the disambiguation page, Dean, with the edit summary, "rm off-topic links". The purpose of a disambiguation page is to assist users in finding topics where there are many subjects which might be known by the same way. There is no such thing as an "off-topic" link on a disambig page, so long as the name of the thing in the link is the name that is being disambiguated. Cheers! bd2412 T 15:34, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

About religion

"Episcopalianism" is a recognized word in English. Furthermore, in many other articles, it is standard, that the religion of a politician or other VIP is stated as for e. g. "Judaism" instead of "Jew", or "Methodism" instead of "Methodist". -- 119.94.198.86 (talk) 23:08, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Fathammer

Hello Bpmullins. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Fathammer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: They've attached themselves to a number of games that are notable enough to have articles. That's a sufficient assertion of notability for A7. PROD or take to AfD if required. Thank you. Ged UK 16:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Jose Delgado

The man whose page I vandalized is the man who wrote "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society." I understand that vandalism isn't very polite, but calling someone a homosexual is a far cry from implanting a device in their mind to control their actions with radio transmissions (before you think I am insane, read Jose's page). I am not saying what you did wasn't absolutely correct, as I have no proof Dr. Delgado has sex with men, and thus your revision was justifiable.

I just wanted you, BPmullins, to know what horrible deeds Dr. Jose Delgado has performed in his life so you don't think I am vandalizing people's pages who don't absolutely deserve it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.112.220.182 (talk) 02:15, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category: Bishops of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America

Thank you for fixing my error in changing the category for Frederick Borsch. At the time I made the change I thought that Los Angeles was a sub group of California. I have posted a question at Wikipedia_talk:Categories_for_discussion#Category:_Bishops_of_the_Episcopal_Church_in_the_United_States_of_America regarding this subject which has not received any replies to date. I was wondering if you had any input of the subject. Dbiel ^(Talk) 00:29, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. The difference between California the state and California the diocese isn't readily apparent. I don't spend much time thinking about categories, but I'll check the CfD. Cheers -- BPMullins | Talk 15:13, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ichthus: January 2012

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

Ichthus is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions and subscriptions contact the Newsroom

WP:Anglican navbox colour discussion

Hullo, fellow WikiProject-er. We're having a discussion about the colours of Anglicanism navboxes. Please do come along and weigh in. D B D 17:47, 30 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thomasina, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tasmin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Attainded v Attainted

Hi, I noticed your edit on Richard Whiting (abbot) changing "attainded" to "attainted" (while leaving the piped link to Attainder). Is there a particular reason for this?— Rod ^talk 15:56, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I was simply correcting what appeared to be an misspelling. The adjective is indeed attainted. OED has " 2. Subjected to attainder n." with a first appearance in 1596. attainded doesn't appear at all.

OK thanks.— Rod ^talk 08:00, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bishop Pike

hi BP ...

I was reading the article on Grace Cathedral and noticed you deleted a section which you said was "mostly about James Pike and not very complimentary ..." Would you happen to have that url handy ? I looked through the history of the article but am not very good at backtracking wikipedia.

Bishop Pike is sort of a hobby of mine, I was confirmed by him at Grace shortly before he went off to the desert. Not sure if there was a connection :-) 210.22.142.82 (talk) 11:13, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I removed a 'trivia' section, which included a reference to a Joan Didion essay about Bp. Pike.

As I said on the talk page, (and from memory) it didn't have much to do with Grace Cathedral. Hope this helps!

The removed item read:

Joan Didion wrote about Bishop James Pike and the building of the Grace Cathedral in her collection of essays, The White Album, The Noonday Press/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, NY, 1979.

BPMullins | Talk 22:24, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Bpmullins. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Bpmullins. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Bpmullins. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsch v. Kirschwasser

Hello Bpmullins. An article move discussion ~~is now underway~~ regarding your inquiry about whether the article should be titled Kirsch, or Kirschwasser.
You are invited to ~~join~~ review the discussion. — Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 17:30, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not moved: This is a courtesy notification that the result of the fore mentioned discussion was that the article should not be moved, per consensus. If you have a compelling argument to reopen the discussion, you are asked to create a new page move request, instructions for which are found at Wikipedia:Requested moves#Requesting controversial and potentially controversial moves. Thank you.
— Christopher, Sheridan, OR (talk) 19:56, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]