Talk:Guster

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Rock music

	Rock music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Guster received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which is now archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article.

Untitled

This feels like a fan page. The article is much longer than articles on bands of similar noteworthiness or popularity. How is this band innovative? How have they affected popular culture? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.248.92.43 (talk) 07:23, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It still reads like a fan page... stuff like the drummer "has been affectionately dubbed Thundersomething by fans".... PurpleChez (talk) 14:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question: Is ... 65.95.247.170 09:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

guster is the man...u should really get their music —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 158.123.252.2 (talk • contribs) 03:49, 15 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Hey... I just added/edited a bunch on this article. I'm thinking it should be divided into sections like History, Style, etc. like other band pages. Anyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.225.247.244 (talk • contribs) 15:16, 27 February 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Aren't some of the band traditions mentioned on this page explained poorly? Like during Airport song, you are supposed to wait until the end of the song to throw Ping-Pong balls, just like on the CD. And i think the pixie stick thing is after Happy Frappy, not when they walk on stage. Anyone agree? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Harryfronman (talk • contribs) 06:55, 27 July 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Stuff like that should only be mentioned at all if you can find what Wikipedia considers reliable sources. Otherwise it's pointless fan cruft. This is an encyclopedia, not a fan site, and the article should reflect that. Xtifr _tälk 07:41, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Album covers and copyright

I think that using the album covers in this stylistic/decorative way is pushing the boundaries of fair use. Somebody more knowledgeable than I about the law should weigh in and, if necessary, change the section. Croctotheface 08:18, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since they're being used to illustrate the albums, and not for any other purpose, it should meet the legal definition of fair-use (not that I'm a lawyer or anything). Whether it's proper under Wikipedia's guidelines is much debated, and no real resolution has occurred that I know of. In general, I think the use of album images in a discography is discouraged-but-allowed. You might want to check with Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums, though, since they keep up on this stuff better than I do. Xtifr _tälk 10:22, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my inclination is to remove the images. I think that because this article is about the band, not the albums, it's kind of murky ground to say that we really need six album art images in addition to two other images to illustrate the band. I'd obviously be fine with album art in articles about the albums, but that's not what we're talking about. I also think that using album art this way makes the article look more like a fan page than an encyclopedia. Not to mention that the absence of words is considerably less informative, since it doesn't mention when the albums were released, sales data or anything else. Croctotheface 19:14, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Since the albums do have separate articles, and since this article actually says very little about the albums, I tend to agree with you. If either of those weren't true, I might try to argue. But as it is, I say go for it. Also, if you're looking for things to improve, trivia sections are usually frowned upon too. If left unchecked, they tend to accumulate heaps of unencyclopedic fancruft. This one's not as bad as some, but it's a little excessive. There's even a cleanup tag, {{toomuchtrivia}}, to use in such cases, which offers some good advice. Since this is borderline, and it seems like someone's monitoring the article, I won't bother to tag it, but it's something to keep in mind. You can always add it yourself if you like. Xtifr _tälk 21:37, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Live albums notability

I brought up the issue at Talk:Live 6/17/04 Myrtle Beach, SC#Notability, so w/o any replies I went ahead and merged most of the live albums to the discography. I'll repeat my argument here for convenience:

I've tagged this article as well as most of Guster's other live albums for notability. Sites like Amazon and Barnes & Noble offer all the band's main albums for sale, but none of these date/city-named live releases, leaving it in question if they meet WP:NALBUMS. That policy also states "Album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article or discography article." These articles are clearly nothing more than track listings, making merges likely appropriate.

Mbinebri ^{talk ←} 14:41, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

CMU performance

Guster performed at Carnegie Mellon earlier tonight (September 7) in honor of William Dietrich's donation, in case it's wiki-worthy. --V2Blast (talk) 06:01, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Guster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070826110651/http://www.guster.com:80/archives/setlists.html to http://www.guster.com/archives/setlists.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 05:47, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Guster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 20:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:22, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fancruft

Much of this article reads like a fan page. The closing paragraph of the "style" section is exceptionally bad in this respect. PurpleChez (talk) 14:52, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]