Talk:Gun laws in Massachusetts

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

July 20, 2016 Attorney General Clarifications

This page is not accurate at the moment. The Massachusetts attorney general released clarifications on what weapons are classified as assault weapons, and none of this information is available in the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.240.56.42 (talk) 01:34, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cleanup

Recently a {{Cleanup}} tag was added to the article -- "This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards...." There's plenty of room for improvement here, but I don't see any obvious problems with the article, worthy of being tagged, so I'm going to take the tag back off. But, feel free to re-add the tag, and explain here in this talk page section specifically what needs to be cleaned up. Thanks. — Mudwater^(Talk) 12:05, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it should be divided into sections. That makes sense. — Mudwater^(Talk) 00:36, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The section about open carry is incorrect. I edited it a few weeks ago, but it changed back to being incorrect and since there is no citation there, there is no reason that it should have been changed back since the information currently provided can not be proven factually. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.110.231.26 (talk) 20:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Storage Section - Questionable neutrality without references

Just that. Several decorative adjectives or backhanded attempts to summarize facts instead of providing them (e.g. "effectively nullified" or "effectively turning"). Original author makes no attempts to hide bias with "accomplished by improperly selling firearms to a dealer." 2605:A601:AC77:8F00:9997:9043:E085:76D4 (talk) 23:11, 3 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree — and came here to say this 2601:192:4D00:8460:7CD2:31FB:F603:9A5C (talk) 08:17, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]