Talk:Gull wing

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by the aircraft project.
	This article is supported by the gliding project.

‹See TfM›

Physics: Fluid Dynamics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Fluid Dynamics Taskforce.

On 28 February 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved to Gull wing (aeronautics). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

First use

The Boulton Paul Bourges IIIB had gull wings (or at least an upper one) back in 1920/21 - see here: [1]

Requested move 28 February 2024

Closed requested move discussion

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (closed by non-admin page mover) – Hilst [talk] 00:08, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Gull wing → Gull wing (aeronautics)
Gull-wing → Gull wing

– Insufficient disambiguation with the dabpage (Gull-wing, also Gullwing.) Unlikely to be the primary topic. Move dabpage to its simplest name. 162 etc. (talk) 16:49, 28 February 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. BD2412 T 16:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Physics has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:29, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Aviation has been notified of this discussion. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:30, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Move both per OP. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 08:15, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support some of the other uses get more views[[2]] but may not commonly be called just "Gull wing". Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:17, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:01, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The aircraft wing is the primary topic here. I would however support Gull-wing being turned into a primary redirect and the DABpage being removed. It can direct people to gulls and the door type from a hatnote per WP:TWOOTHER. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 06:38, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as the aeronautical use is the primary topic. GraemeLeggett (talk) 08:40, 6 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: Relisting for clearer consensus. BD2412 T 16:31, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative move the airplane topic to gull-wing aerofoil (c.f. gull-wing door) and move the disambiguation page to gullwing (with direct values 300SL nickname and FFX-series fictional group) -- 65.92.247.66 (talk) 05:00, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.