Jump to content

Talk:Guiseley

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

There is another website to do with Guiseley at www.guiseley.co.uk

Barbara Haydock

[edit]

I've removed the mention of Barbara Haydock from the page on Guiseley yet again. I don't consider Barbara to be notable enough to have an entry here. Her own entry was deleted for being non-notable earlier this year [1]. What do others think? Dupont Circle 17:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Have again reverted the page for the very same reason Dupont Circle 13:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Brian Close

[edit]

Em, so where did he grow up - according to this page it was Guiseley, but he is also listed as Yeadon and Rawdon? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.89.167.121 (talk) 07:27, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page resturcture

[edit]

This page is looking a little bit substandard when compared to pages for other areas in Leeds, especially being as Guisley is a town in its own rights, therefore more notable then the subjects of many better pages. The page needs the following:

  • Additional images (in particularly of the town centre), the current image on its own does not adequately illustrate the town to the reader.
  • The page needs dividing into subject sections (e.g. Lead statement, History, Location, Governance, Transport, Amenities, Sport, See also, External links, References)
  • The current detail needs to be vastly embelished with relevent citations.

I intend to endevour to imrpove the page shortly, however with limited time and not living in the Guisley/Yeadon end of the city, I can not make great progress in a short time. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, especially with the photography elements. Ta, Mtaylor848 (talk) 15:24, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Guiseley/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

.
  1. Requires infobox  Done
  2. Requires more photographs
  3. Requires addition of inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates
  4. Requires structuring
Keith D 12:25, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 16:50, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guiseley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:24, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guiseley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Guiseley. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 7 August 2018

[edit]

Why is Guiseley shown as having a Leeds post town? It doesn't, it is Guiseley. Not leeds. Someone keeps changing it back to Leeds and now it is locked. Ridiculous from the admin MH253 (talk) 13:31, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: The article is correct as written per List of post towns in the United Kingdom and LS postcode area. If all of these articles are inaccurate, please provide reliable sources to support your request. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 13:38, 7 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Guiseley is the town, but LEEDS is the post town. As an example, the address for Guiseley Theatre from the Royal Mail website:

Guiseley Theatre The Green Guiseley, LEEDS LS20 9BT https://m.royalmail.com/mt/www.royalmail.com/find-a-postcode?un_jtt_v_address=Guiseley+Theatre++The+Green%2C+Guiseley%2C+LEEDS%2C+LS20+9BT&un_jtt_v_printaddress=Guiseley+Theatre__+The+Green__Guiseley%2C+LEEDS__LS20+9BT Geofpick (talk) 14:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Guiseley is also served by the stations of Menston to the north and Baildon to the south."

[edit]

I've removed this line as it really wouldn't be the case. If we take the Wetherby Whaler to be the furthest point of Guiseley, it's twice as far to Menston station as it is to Guiseley. And no one would use Baildon station if they lived in Guiseley Dupont Circle (talk) 10:11, 6 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Guiseley&oldid=1202499889"