Talk:Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guilty: Liberal "Victims" and Their Assault on America article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
OBJECTIVE coverage of this book needed!!
[edit]"In this book, Coulter dedicated three pages to defending the Council of Conservative Citizens, which she described as a group that stands for "a strong national defense, the right to keep and bear arms, the traditional family, and an 'America First' trade policy," and also labeled critics of the CofCC as liberals who "have no principles". Coulter denied the group was racist, stating that "There is no evidence on its Web page that the modern incarnation of the CCC supports segregation." However, the group opposes interracial marriage, refers to African-Americans as "genetically inferior", and has been described as a "thinly veiled white supremacist organization" by the New York Times.[1]"
Screaming bias. Where is the "neutrality" flag? Or does it not apply to works created by conservatives? 216.54.22.188 (talk) 23:59, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. This is very biased. Why does the article say that it is a "fact" that Obama was thrown softball questions? That's an opinion, and this article needs to be overhauled. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eclecticperson34 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
Just curious but, what specifics on their website point to racism? I don't see how "There is no evidence on its Web page that the modern incarnation of the CCC supports segregation." is denying a group as racist. You need a better source than the New York Times if you're claiming to be unbiased. I think you need to revisit your argument. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.57.120.77 (talk) 14:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
- One blocked school student 11 years ago, an editor with only 11 edits from 8 years ago, and an IP with only the above edit complaining about a mainstream newspaper. Doug Weller talk 19:41, 27 October 2020 (UTC)