Talk:Guillaume de Nangis

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Guillaume de Nangis article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sempad's letter

According to this the letter was incorporated in an OFr version in William of Nangis's vie of Louis IX. This was not hard to track down online. Go here at Gallica and go to pages 361–3. This is William's redaction of the letter. I found several other references (at JSTOR and the like) to William's version and to other scholars who have helped to date the letter or place it geographically, but none to a Latin edition. Srnec (talk) 05:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manuscript situation

Anyone expert enough on the topic to say something about the copies (number, where, etc.)? Twice the article seems to imply there is only a single manuscript and that is in the British Library. Yet there is at least one other source (Vatican Library Reg. Lat. 544) so there are likely others. Just learned of this person today, so not feeling like I have the expertise to edit yet. -- Michael Scott Asato Cuthbert (talk) 21:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]