Talk:Ground truth

Ground truthing in machine learning

What is "objective data"? --MartinThoma (talk) 17:11, 23 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Objective data can be proven. Contrast with subjective data, which is driven by opinion. I'll add that to the page. Adam Katz Δ ☎ 03:37, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ground truth vs. Gold standard

As noted in Talk:Gold standard (test), the term "gold standard" is actually more faithful than "ground truth" with respect to most usage in machine learning and information retrieval. This is because ML and IR make assumptions about the classification of labeled data (mostly because human classification, which is often itself error-prone, does not scale). I had to resist "correcting" a recent edit that muddied this point from the ML perspective. That said, these and related fields of study do not (in my experience) use the term "gold standard," even if it is more appropriate. Adam Katz Δ ☎ 20:07, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All definitions are identical

As far as I can tell, these definitions are all identical, with very minor differences. However, I'm only expert on the machine learning part, so I'm not comfortable doing that myself. Adam Katz Δ ☎ 00:02, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confusion about paragraph of GIS

I do not like how the paragraph "Geographical Information Systems" begins:

Geographic information systems such as GIS, GPS, and GNSS,

GIS is just synonym for Geographic information system. And how is GPS a GIS?? This should be re-worded, but I am not sure how. Rmasta (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:41, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Document analysis

The concept of ground truth seems important in digital document analysis. See the work of the Pattern Recognition & Image Analysis Research Lab, University of Salford, Manchester, http://www.primaresearch.org/tools/Aletheia, http://www.primaresearch.org/www/assets/papers/ICPR2010_Pletschacher_PAGE.pdf and elsewhere. This seems to be an important use of the concept, but an entry about this use should be written by somebody of the field (I am not). --Dominique Meeùs (talk) 09:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ground truth. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060911012029/http://forest.esf.edu/unsupervisedClass.html to http://forest.esf.edu/unsupervisedClass.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:21, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]