Talk:Grosse Pointe South High School

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A suggestion for Wikipedians doing drive-by edits on this article

It is much more helpful to try to work with people to cite their sources or to try to cite their sources yourself than it is to delete large swaths of clearly well-intentioned articles. Particularly if all you're doing is a drive-by edit with no regard for the state of the article after your earth-scorching. It's like seeing a plant in need of some water, sunlight, and a little fertilizer and instead of tending to the plant you take a blowtorch to it because whatever power trip you're on blinds you from seeing any potential. You are not helping increase the knowledge of humanity by doing this.

It is also important to be mindful of how you approach editing articles highly relevant to specific communities. For instance, this article is of very minor importance to people in, say, Oregon, but is of very major importance to people living in Grosse Pointe. I reckon that most people who have ever visited or edited this article are people who either attended the high school or have lived in Grosse Pointe. So if you're a person sitting at your computer in Oregon, who likely has never been to Grosse Pointe let alone attended Grosse Pointe South High School, and are about to delete half the article that you never would have visited if not for your power trip, please keep in mind you're deleting the work that an entire community spent years doing. Musicals, school plays, concerts, athletic and scholastic achievement, pictures of all of it. Gone with a click. You are not helping increase the knowledge of humanity by doing this.

Especially so if you're doing all this because someone years ago forgot or didn't know how to add citations for a book they've read. I mean, seriously, you're deleting half an article because you didn't see book citations? What are the odds you would've even got a copy of the book to verify the citations? I'd say close to zero if I'm being generous.

I'm writing this because a few months ago half of the contents of this article was removed in a single day by a single Wikipedian who made absolutely no effort to help. A fair portion of the deleted contents were even things already verified or easily verifiable.

You are not helping increase the knowledge of humanity by deleting text like "In 1993, Grosse Pointe South was added to the National Register of Historic Places for its significance in architecture, art, and education" due to not seeing a citation. Especially when there was a link to the NRHP listing already in the article and all you had to do was click that link, verify the information, and add the citation.

So, please, fellow Wikipedians, either try to help or leave the article alone. The whole point of Wikipedia is to learn things. If you're an editor and you spend most of your time deleting things and reverting edits, you're probably doing Wikipedia wrong. I get that deleting and reverting are super easy things to do and you can do a whole bunch of them in a single session. But I guarantee you'll start feeling a lot more fulfilled if you actually start trying to improve articles. You might even learn something.

'lectric eye (talk) 16:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

Can someone explain "Alma Mater" in its section?

An Alma Mater is an anthem of a school. Are you looking for the meaning of the term Alma Mater, or some kind of interpretation of GPS's Alma Mater?

Much of this article

seems to be copied from :http://www.cr.nps.gov/nr/travel/detroit/d3.htm. It is not going to last much longer unless someone explains something. Carptrash 20:48, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I wouldn't remove it outright. The NPS site is public domain, so there is no copyright violation, just lazy editing. Some pruning and revision would certainly be in order though. older ≠ wiser 20:56, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of pruning...

Article has gotten out of hand re: mention of faculty, students, trivia. WP:WPSCH/AG offers guidelines related to school articles; for instance:

# Mention significant championships for the sports teams. Specific students should not be mentioned unless they are notable in their own right.

# Notable teachers/faculty — The names of current and former teachers should only be included if they are notable in their own right (for example, they are published authors or they have won a teaching award) or they have been the subject of multiple non-trivial press coverage.

Like a lot of high school articles, this has become a newsletter. JNW (talk) 00:38, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Luther King Visit

I don't see how this is relevant. It's a blip in the history of the school. Bill Heller (talk) 04:08, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Grosse Pointe South High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:16, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Grosse Pointe South High School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 10:54, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]