User talk:Billheller

User page edits?

Hey there, Billheller. I'm trying to figure out your edit here. Since it is a user page, why should edits by IP addresses be restored on there by you as "good faith" acts rather than letting the user decide what's on his or her description page? Cheers, Not Sure (talk) 00:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment! With this edit, I undid an edit by anon IP 89... which removed pertinent information about an individual who happens to be under investigation. As this edit was made 6 months or so ago, I can't remember the exact situation but I can gather from the relevant data that an anonymous user attempted to scrub information from a user page. We have no way of knowing (in fact we can assume it is NOT) the use himself who scrubbed that information because if it was the user, he would have signed in to make the edit to his page. I assumed it was a 'Joe Schmo'. If the actual user wants to change his page back, he can feel free and sign in to change it. Have an awesome day! Bill Heller (talk) 02:24, 2 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK, got it -- thanks, Billheller! In this case, the best approach, I think, is to revert the anonymous user page edits to the last one done by the actual user. That way there is no confusion about which information should or should not be on the user's page instead of having IPs or others make that decision for him. Greetings and best wishes, Not Sure (talk) 01:50, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds good! Bill Heller (talk) 22:11, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Archiving my Talk ...

... so copy 'n' pasting: Good morning Bill,
Pleased to hear back from you. It is always good to know that my replying here is read by the addressee.
I do hope your Aunt Karen has a happy retirement. All the best, — | Gareth Griffith-Jones |The WelshBuzzard| — 09:33, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm TracyMcClark. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Shelley Shannon, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! --TMCk (talk) 20:05, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]