Jump to content

Talk:Grey parrot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 14 July 2020 and 20 August 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Laur-Bes.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:59, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Subspecies of African Gray Parrots

[edit]

The Congo African Gray Parrot is a subspecies of African Gray, as well as the Timneh. They are the same species, and the information should apply to them both. This makes nearly the entire article wrong, starting from where it says that the African Gray is the same thing as the Congo African Gray. Clearly, the person who wrote it does not know what they were writing about. I see no link to Alex, probably the most famous of all African Grays. 173.66.171.50 (talk) 13:35, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Soon to make an account[reply]

A (fairly) recent Birdlife International ruling split the Congo and Timneh Greys into separate species. This is also supported by the IOC World Bird List. Officially they're called the 'Grey Parrot' and 'Timneh Parrot' now, though I still use 'Congo African Grey Parrot' and 'Timneh African Grey Parrot'... --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 23:16, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Also, you might like to take a look at Psittacus. Most of the information which could pertain to both species was retained there when the changes were made. It's a much longer article. --Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 23:22, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

African Grey

[edit]

The articles that you read about African grays on Wikipedia are so outdated RUPRICT (talk) 00:15, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be good to say how this brid flies Skihatboatbike (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

African Grey

[edit]

This article on African grays is so incorrect it I've had one for 14 years there are two subspecies that are not the same species at all they can't breed RUPRICT (talk) 00:17, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

"African grey" -> "Grey" rush

[edit]

Jaspergeli, may I ask whence this sudden fervour for redirecting and replacing all instances of "African grey parrot" in favour of "Grey parrot"? While it hardly seems worth the bother, it is certainly not useful to do it in such a hackneyed fashion, i.e., search & removal of all instances of "African". That broke all manner of image links and references. If you have to do it, please do it carfeully and sensibly. I am, however, not convinced that it is necessary at all. Both common names are in use, and various interlinked articles are currently set up nicely using "African grey parrot". What's the point here? --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 19:31, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. Still can't be done with a steam shovel. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 21:19, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, I messed up some characters. Jaspergeli (talk) 01:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

recent news/publications on intelligence

[edit]

Name

[edit]

Should we add a section on how its commonly called 'African grey parrot' And how timneys are called TAG and congos called CAG? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.88.180.130 (talk • contribs)

Those are now separate species: Timneh parrot (new species) and Congo grey parrot (this species). Note the names in the lede of both o those articles. Also, see Psittacus#Taxonomy. - UtherSRG (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 8 October 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Raladic (talk) 15:13, 15 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

– The Timneh parrot was traditionally considered a grey parrot. Continuing to call the species Psittacus erithacus the "grey parrot" after the split is incredibly misleading, suggesting that the Timneh parrot is still included, even though it is not. Common names do not have type specimens/species. They are population-based, not type-based. If the concept of "grey parrots" included Timneh parrots prior to the split, it must continue to do so. I understand that Clements Checklist calls the Congo grey parrot "Gray Parrot", but in the minds of most people "grey parrot" and "African grey parrot" still refer to the entire genus. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:37, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: for what it's worth, I'd always heard the two (sub)species being referred to as "Congo African grey parrot" and "Timneh African grey parrot". Iloveparrots (talk) 10:42, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'd like to hear what the folks who have been keeping the bird articles internally consistent have to say: @Cs california and Aa77zz: I'd also think that we'd move Timneh to Timneh grey parrot for consistency. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:59, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Birds has been notified of this discussion. UtherSRG (talk) 12:01, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose move. Grey parrot and Timneh parrot are the names listed by the IOC (see here). We've agreed to use the names adopted by the IOC - having one source for the names makes it much easier to maintain consistency across the different wikipedia articles - and avoids wasting time with long arguments as to which name to adopt. I notice that Birdlife/IUCN uses Grey parrot and Clements/ebird Gray parrot. There is currently a big effort underway to align the common names and the taxonomy of the different ornithological authorities - see the WGAC and the latest ebird news. IOC have been changing English names to align with other lists. I don't always agree with their choices but it makes no sense for Wikipedia to adopt different names. - Aa77zz (talk) 13:00, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Whatever happened to WP:COMMONNAME, WP:OFFICIAL and WP:ASTONISH? English names are part of English. They are determined by usage by the public, not checklists. If we base them on checklist names, they might as well be scientific names. In English, "grey parrot" means Psittacus, not Psittacus erithacus. In this case, the IOC name for Psittacus erithacus, "Grey Parrot", must be rejected as it is narrower than the concept that term usually refers to. Unless there are extraordinary circumstances, language favours the broad senses of terms, not the narrow ones. After all, if someone calls a Congo grey parrot a "grey parrot", this is consistent with both senses. Meanwhile, someone calling a Timneh parrot a "grey parrot" is only consistent with the broad sense. There are therefore more uses of the term "grey parrot" that are consistent with the broad sense than the narrow sense. So the broad sense is the sense that Wikipedia must adopt. Grey Clownfish (talk) 13:23, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    The first two sentences of both grey parrot and Timneh parrot handle all of the "but what about X name?" arguments. It clearly indicates how the articles are aligned. As such, I am in agreement with Aa77zz and oppose this move request. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • My impression, confirmed by comments above on the talk page and a web search, is that the actual common name is "African grey", or perhaps "African grey parrot" (sometimes with "grey" spelled "gray", but with "African" included). Brittanica has African gray parrot (including "African"). Of course the grey/gray spelling is just a minor WP:ENGVAR issue. Ngrams here. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 21:26, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    I think (afaik anyway) that the species was known as the African grey parrot before they were split into two species. The subspecies were known as "Congo African grey parrot" and "Timneh African grey parrot". I'd support renaming both species to these two titles. Far more descriptive names anyway. Iloveparrots (talk) 22:31, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Actually, they are not more descriptive. Congo Basin and Timneh country are parts of Africa, so the names "Congo African grey parrot" and "Timneh African grey parrot" are pleonasms, and no more descriptive than "Congo grey parrot" and "Timneh grey parrot". Apart from that, adding more words does make for a more descriptive name.
    As such, I can understand the avoidance of the names "Congo African grey parrot" and "Timneh African grey parrot". I'm not sure why the name "African grey parrot" would be avoided though. I don't know what it is with ornithologists avoiding the avicultural names for parrots, maybe it is to distance themselves from what they see as a cruel and environmentally-destructive industry. By the way, I actually agree that keeping parrots as pets is cruel and environmentally-destructive.
    Examples of ornithologists seeming to avoid the use of certain avicultural names for parrots include avoidance of the names "African grey parrot", "conure" and "caique". For the latter two, they use "parakeet" instead, which seems pretty silly to me. Conures may not be a clade, but neither are parakeets. Caiques are a clade. Both "conure" and "caique" are more specific than "parakeet", with "conure" being limited to Arinae and "caique" to Pionites.
    If they really are avoiding avicultural names just because of their use in aviculture because they don't like the pet parrot industry, that seems counterproductive to me. If people who want to keep, say, conures as pets want to find out information about them, they are likely to look up something like "green cheek conure". When ornithologists use the term "green-cheeked parakeet" instead, odds are, those results won't show up. So it actually creates an echo chamber. So people who keep parrots as pets get less information about them from ornithologists, simply because they use different common names for parrots. No wonder there are misconceptions like parrot species being breeds and cockatoos being Old World parrots.
    I reckon it's likely that those who keep parrots as pets are in general poorly-informed about them, as if they were more informed they'd recognise that parrots need a flock, making keeping them as pets cruel unless they are willing to keep many parrots, which is impractical. And even though, like most animals, parrots tend live longer in zoos than in the wild, they tend to live shorter as pets, which shows how poorly-informed the owners are. It's not that the name issue is the reason for this, but it might be a contributing factor. Grey Clownfish (talk) 07:21, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note Looking back in the article's history, this page's title was "African Grey Parrot" until it was moved in 2014 without an article-specific discussion. Iloveparrots (talk) 22:40, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The moves in 2014 were back-and-forth for a Latin name and capitalization. It wasn't until 14:01, 5 August 2017‎ (UTC) that someone dropped "African". That was in a somewhat clumsy series of edits, in which, for example, the word "African" was incorrectly removed from the titles of the cited sources. That series of edits was reverted in the next edit just a few hours later, but the page move was not. The editor that removed "African" from the title hasn't made any edits in the last several years. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 02:20, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose a slippery slope if we do not follow well-reasoned standards that are evolved by large committees of specialists. The removal of "African" was I think part of the general principle of the IOC to aim for shorter names. There will be more changes coming soon, such as the avoidance of people's names as people, as judged in the future, are very likely to have been on the wrong side of history. Those old names will come up as being more frequent in Google searches but it would not serve WP to use that as a proxy for WP:COMMONNAME. Shyamal (talk) 13:46, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    It is not well-reasoned in this case. Timneh parrots should have never been removed from the concept of grey parrots. If they really wanted a shorter name than "Congo grey parrot", for Psittacus erithacus sensu stricto, they could have called it "Congo parrot".
    To redefine "grey parrot" as Psittacus erithacus sensu stricto is incredibly confusing. And Wikipedia does not have to follow it. Seriously. We name our Republic of Türkiye article Turkey. We don't even name it Türkiye. We name our X (social media) article Twitter. How is this different? I'll tell you how, because Türkiye and X named themselves that, making those names extra-official. Congo grey parrots never named themselves anything.
    Common name over official name. Why is this principle completely disregarded for bird species, to the point of using an ambiguous, misleading name? I'd even argue that Wikipedia should stop using IOC as even its official taxonomy for birds, let alone source of English names. This reliance on IOC violates WP:NPOV.
    And this reminds me of the capitalisation issue. I'm surprised that with all this pro-IOC bias, Wikipedia doesn't capitalise bird species' English names, as IOC does. Apparently, we actually have a policy against capitalising species' English names. I actually think this policy should be revoked, as Wikipedia should follow the literature. And the literature might actually capitalise the names.
    And following the literature is also why we shouldn't blindly copy IOC names. The literature is not just IOC. Grey Clownfish (talk) 06:48, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There are several other parrots in the Congo and the birds may occur outside that political region, those may be the reasons for not going with that option. In any case the IOC can be sent suggestions and they do take up corrections where needed (at least they did when I pointed out the problem with Sind_sparrow which they had at one point shortened from "Sind jungle sparrow" to "jungle sparrow") Shyamal (talk) 09:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
But somehow "Timneh parrot" is OK? It has the same problem. And same with Senegal parrot.
And with "grey parrot", the problem isn't just that the Timneh parrot is also grey, and was traditionally considered a grey parrot and is still often called one today, but also that the Gang-gang cockatoo is also grey. This is why I think Psittacus should be called "African grey parrot". Grey Clownfish (talk) 09:46, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Please consider WP:BLUDGEON and WP:Dropthestick. You've made your points. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:32, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grey_parrot&oldid=1251320001"