Talk:Grey Lynn

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Auckland Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Auckland, which aims to improve the coverage of Auckland, New Zealand, on Wikipedia. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.AucklandWikipedia:WikiProject AucklandTemplate:WikiProject AucklandWikiProject Auckland articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I'm not sure whether the Pacific Island flavour of Grey Lynn has diminished that greatly- most homes owned by Pasifika have been retained through the generations

Proposed deletion

This paragraph:

Historically part of the central government electorate of Auckland Central, the suburb has generally voted for New Zealand Labour Party candidates. However, the increasing gentification described above may see a move to the centre-right in the suburb's aggregated future voting patterns. Green Party candidates have also done well in the area, with the suburb also hosting some organic-industry shops, and anti-GE/GM foods stickers being a common sight on cars parked on the suburb's streets and its houses' mailboxes in the mid-2000s.

does not seem to be supported by any reference (or based on my observations of the suburb, actual facts). I think the first sentence may or may not be true - Auckland Central certainly has a Labour MP, whether that means the majority of GRey Lynn residents vote Labour is an accurate representation I dont know, the second is speculation and the third is just not supported. Gacole (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It would be possible to get an overall picture of how the suburb votes from the individual polling booths - see [1]. Voters are not required to use the polling booth closest to their house, so the voters at each booth are not solely the voters who live in the area, but there would be a high correlation. To improve the accuracy, earlier election results could be analysed in the same way.

However, the relevance of this to the article is minimal, and as you say the rest of the paragraph is speculative, so I support removal of the material.-gadfium 21:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]