Talk:Gregory Vlastos

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Philosophy: Philosophers / Contemporary Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophers
	Contemporary philosophy

Greece Low‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unintelligible sentence

The following sentence conveys no meaning to me:Platonic Forms were a ridiculous possibility and developed in to traditional narrative due to academic laziness. Can the person who wrote this sentence please clarify it?Lestrade 14:55, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Suspicious

Anonymous user 129.78.64.105 posted a comment on Vlastos's "A Metaphysical Paradox." In it, he uses the phrase "to his acclaim" as well as the words "ridiculous" and "laziness." These seem, to me, to be evaluative and are therefore results of the anonymous editor's point of view. If there is no objection, I will delete the passage.Lestrade 13:01, 3 October 2006 (UTC)Lestrade[reply]

Vlastos's students - who?

The article states: "Many of Vlastos's students have become important scholars of ancient philosophy." I'm curious as to who these scholars are. The statement may very well be true, but it's awfully hollow without any examples. Can anyone provide any? Ejectgoose 06:02, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 04:04, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

This article is lacking sources and might use a list of his published works.

See http://www.giffordlectures.org/Author.asp?AuthorID=172. Just incorporating that and overlaying a Wikipedia layout would do a lot for this article. Debresser (talk) 13:02, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See here, here and here for booklists. Debresser (talk) 13:21, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did some work on the article, including and formost a (partial) list of published works and Wikipedia layout. By the way, I see that I was wrong about the Gifford Lectures link. It did not contain anything new. Debresser (talk) 16:32, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I received a message (that I can not find), from some one asking me if Gregory Vlastos is one of the Vlastos family. The answer is YES. DNA tests have shown that ALL Vlastos around the world are one and the same family. Gregory has a son called Stephan (I spoke with him about 10 years ago, I think he is also a UNI Professor (like father like Son) and a daughter Maria.

(Akrogiali (talk) 05:00, 12 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

That message was on the talk page of the article Vlastos which you wrote. As I said there, you might want to add a small paragraph about him inside that article as one of the notable member of that house. Debresser (talk) 09:44, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I actually removed the "article" because there were a few that did not like it and I could not see any future. Some body else re-entered it. However, I have no plans to improve it. I am too old to argue with those with fixed ideas about how the world should look like. There are about 50 famous Vlastos and Gregory is one of them. (Akrogiali (talk) 01:34, 14 February 2009 (UTC))[reply]

With all respect to your age and erudition, it's not a matter of "people with fixed iseas anout hoe the world should look like". it's because this is the whole idea of Wikipedia: any article can be written and redacted by anybody, but within the parameters that have been defined by the Wikipedia community. Debresser (talk) 17:14, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. (talk) —Preceding undated comment was added on 01:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gregory Vlastos. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927011217/http://www.aps-pub.com/proceedings/1482/480211.pdf to http://www.aps-pub.com/proceedings/1482/480211.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:24, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]