Talk:Gregory Henriquez
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Gregory Henriquez appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 May 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Conflict of interest
[edit]User:Gory18 (talk)) appears to have a conflict of interest in creating and editing this article. The editor has been warned on his user talk page and referred to Wikipedia's conflict of interest guidelines. - Fayenatic (talk) 13:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
- A single-purpose account, User:Archidada (talk), has reduced the content and removed the COI tag. It is not clear whether this editor is also connected to the subject of the article. - Fayenatic (talk) 17:21, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- What do you know, another SPA User:Vanart69 (talk) has joined in. This is a distinctive pattern of editing history. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:18, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Lists are still too long
[edit]If so much has been written about him, doesn't anybody have the time and interest to precis some of the most pertinent material from those articles, and cite them as the sources?
Even the "See also" list is too long, and most entries in it need explanations as to why the linked article is relevant to this one. See WP:LAYOUT for guidance. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I won't tag the lists again after the further reductions made today. However, the above advice still applies. - Fayenatic (talk) 22:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
- The expanded article is a lot more worthwhile, although it may need toning-down in places. Please see WP:SEEALSO for guidance on the "See also" section, which has been trimmed again. - Fayenatic (talk) 18:25, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
All the tagged problems have now been resolved, and I have nominated the article as expanded by user:Mbtso (talk) to feature in WP:Did You Know. - Fayenatic (talk) 21:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Oh I see....
[edit]I came here to complain about such phrases as "In society’s absence of awareness and belief in a cosmological order, Henriquez glimpses residues of the former order still lingering, accompanied by a longing for the orientation that would allow people to feel at home in the world" .... Henriquez's mum I suggest might feel a tad emabaressed by the flowery stuff. AND. If society isnt aware of its own existance and no one believes the cosmos has order ,,,, then we are wasting time telling people about the inner thoughts of architects. This article is too florrid to be reprinted as a blurb. Needs a rewrite by disinterested editors. Victuallers (talk) 16:16, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- Go forth and reconquer this Holy Land from the hands of the Infidels! (Thoreau). TNXMan 16:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
- You should have seen it before... but do go ahead. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:31, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Renaming the article
[edit]Given that the work of this individual has been almost entirely through the firm Henriquez Partners Architects, which was founded and made notable by Gregory Henriquez's father, I suggest the article be renamed and re-focused to Henriquez Partners Architects. As it stands now, it seems to be an almost embarrassing peacock feathering of an individual. An individual who has achieved some noteworthiness, but not as much as this length of article with all of its filler would indicate. Thoughts? Architectsea (talk) 2015 October 14
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:07, 13 July 2019 (UTC)
Removing fluff
[edit]I am making a series of significant edits to this page because there was a lot of fluff and weird junk in it. I am going to remove most of this "Inspiration from personal stories" section because it is mostly nonsense. Raininginvancouver 22:45, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Vancouver articles
- Mid-importance Vancouver articles
- WikiProject Vancouver articles
- Start-Class Canada-related articles
- Low-importance Canada-related articles
- Start-Class Manitoba articles
- Low-importance Manitoba articles
- All WikiProject Canada pages
- Start-Class Architecture articles
- Mid-importance Architecture articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles