Talk:Gregg Jarrett

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:21, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible bias by omitting evidence validating Jarrett's claim

Is it possible that this article unnecessarily biases the reader by not including a sample of journalists confirming the accuracy of his reporting, as well as those disputing inaccuracies in his reporting. In particular, it might be useful to include material from "The Russia Hoax" that was confirmed by Inspector General Horowitz's report on the FBI's investigation of the Trump campaign.

It's just my opinion, but this article seems to say less about Jarrett's actual thesis regarding what he terms "the Russia hoax" and more about how critics refute it. I am not suggesting that this article be a stand-in for the controversy over the Russian collusion investigation, but that there are journalists who confirm Jarrett's thesis. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milkchaser (talk • contribs) 17:06, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Father's Rights Lawyers

Cordell and Cordell have been paid $30,000 in the last year and my son is bankrupt, losing his home,his job, his kids because the court commissioner gives spouse 29% of gross for child care,and $817. a month for maintenance. He made $27(?) an hour and she got a job making 14 an hour. How is this fair. 2600:1008:B152:8921:74E6:116E:2620:E6A (talk) 23:44, 17 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]