Talk:Gregg Doyel

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Journalism

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Radio Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Radio-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RadioWikipedia:WikiProject RadioTemplate:WikiProject RadioRadio articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Create: Missing years and articles in radio, National Association of Radio Distress-Signalling and Infocommunications (Hungary)
Assess : Unassessed Radio articles; Unknown-importance Radio articles
Cleanup : Radio articles needing attention
Expand : Midweek Politics Bob Crane
Maintain : Portal:Radio
Stubs : Expand: Radio stubs
Verify : Unreferenced BLPs
Other : Collaboration of the Week:
Requests for Radio peer review:

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Regular Readers

Why was the caught cheating inserted? --Ndlovunkulu 03:08, 21 September 2007 (UTC) Gregg Doyel should also being mentioned as a controversial figure. He has a history of asking sensationalized and nonessential questions creating confrontations See LeBron James post game conference, Jim Boeheim's post NCAA game conference, Dan Patrick's radio appearance. In addition he has defended his racist and unqualified coworker Mike Freeman in the past. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.66.36.254 (talk) 06:45, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated deletions of well sourced information and no explanation

What is going on with this page and why is user SR023 obsessed with deleting well sourced, relevant information? Anyone he knows anything about Doyel knows he makes his living on being provocative and creating controversy and there is nothing wrong with pointing that out as long as the information is backed up with citations. The parts about Duke and Bob Kraft were on this page with multiple citations backing them up for a long time with no issues whatsoever. Recently however SR023 decided to pick a fight and has repeatedly and without explanation delete these passages. Looking at his user page, this is not the first time he has been called out for this sort of behavior. I think a.) these passages should be added back in when the article's protection expires later this month and b.) an admin should be contacted if user SR023 continues this behavior. DB42817 (talk) 01:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the explanation: it's a poorly sourced, unencylopedic BLP violation being repeatedly added by accounts whose sole purpose seems to be to add potentially defamatory material to a living person's biography. You actually believe that "and in the opinion of many, frequent perspectively biased stories..." is appropriate? Come on. Sro23 (talk) 02:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation makes no sense: the passages you removed about Duke and Bob Kraft were WELL SOURCED (there's that word again) and your history of removing WELL SOURCED information from other pages (as documented on your user talk page) means you don't get the benefit of the doubt. You need tone down your sense of entitlement and check your privilege: this article belongs to all wiki users, not just you. I'm going to continue to add these WELL SOURCED passages when the protection ends and if you don't like it we will just have to have an admin decide. Have a pleasant evening :) DB42817 (talk) 02:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To SR023 - Below is what I plan to add back into he article - It is a slightly revised version of the passages you have been deleting. Note that I have removed the specific line that you said you had a problem with. I also made a couple minor grammatical changes. If you would like to have an adult conversation about this, I'd welcome it. DB42817 (talk) 13:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Doyel was known at CBSSports.com for provocative and contentious columns. One example was a 2012 column[1] about a potential NCAA violation regarding Duke basketball and 2010 freshman player Lance Thomas, where Doyel was harshly critical on Duke, but did not mention mention that Duke self-reported the possible violation. In the end, the NCAA cleared Duke of involvement in a violation in the incident. Doyel has also purportedly exercised posting imprecise information to get page views. In September 2015, shortly after Patriots quarterback Tom Brady's suspension was vacated by a federal judge, Doyel erroneously stated that Patriots owner Robert Kraft had accepted the findings of the now discredited Ted Wells report.[2] despite the fact that Kraft has vehemently and repeatedly disagreed with its findings [3] [4]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DB42817 (talk • contribs) 13:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@DB42817: Since Doyel isn't even mentioned at either of the latter cited sources, and the first citation is a 404, it's a simple matter to say that no, you can't make these claims about Gregg Doyel based on those citations. The transcript at media.weei.com, which is mostly gibberish and itself bears a disclaimer as to accuracy, cannot be used as a reliable source for anything. You cannot claim a motive for someone's actions (much less errors or omissions) in the absence of a citation of a reliable source that explicitly makes the claim. General Ization ^Talk 13:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Good afternoon. I understand your point about the visual transcript, but Doyel is mentioned prominently in the WEEI audio file, which is why i posted it as a citation. And although he is not mentioned in the other two sources, they prove that he misrepresented Kraft's statements, which is addressed in the audio file. I will find another citation about the Duke story, I didnt realize the link did not work anymore. DB42817 (talk) 20:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Using the latter sources, you may be able to show that Doyel was mistaken about Kraft's statements, but proving that does not prove misrepresentation by Doyel or an intent to do so. General Ization ^Talk 20:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

(DB42817 blocked indef as a sockpuppet.) General Ization ^Talk 22:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]