User talk:DB42817

Welcome!

Hello, DB42817, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SRO23, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Linguist ^talk|contribs 21:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SRO23

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SRO23, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Linguist ^talk|contribs 21:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ballsohard55 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 21:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DB42817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here} 1.) There is no sock puppetry going on and I want to be unblocked. 2.)I double down onmy request for an SPI agaisnt SR023. It is an amazing coincidence that this 'wikihatesfreedom' user just happened to appear right as SR023 was being called out for deleting and hiding. DB42817 (talk) 21:21, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Accusing another editor of sockpuppetry in your unblock request never goes well. RickinBaltimore (talk) 21:52, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DB42817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The fact remains that SRO23 falsely accused me of sock puppetry and I would like to be unblocked. I've done nothing wrong

Decline reason:

I don't believe you. The sockpuppetry looks pretty plain. Yamla (talk) 15:44, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DB42817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I'm appealing my block once again for the same reason I appealed last time - SRO23 falsely accused me of sock puppetry and I would like to be unblocked. I have done nothing wrong and will continue to appeal again and again and again and again for as long as it takes. I also stand by my request for a SPI into SR023 DB42817 (talk) 22:21, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Given the behavioural evidence, you will find it difficult to convince an administrator that you are not a sockpuppet. Huon (talk) 23:05, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

DB42817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: I'm appealing my block once again for the same reason I appealed last time - SRO23 falsely accused me of sock puppetry and I would like to be unblocked. I have done nothing wrong and will continue to appeal again and again and again and again for as long as it takes. I also stand by my request for a SPI into SR023 DB42817 (talk) 23:09, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simply repeating the same request and hoping to get a different response is not going to work, and your promise to keep repeating it over and over is disruptive. Talk page access revoked. See WP:UTRS if you want to appeal further. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 23:42, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

DB42817 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17680 was submitted on Mar 05, 2017 00:32:23. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 00:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]