Jump to content

Talk:Green Goblin

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I think the link to “venom” in the first sentence should be the marvel character (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Venom_(character)?wprov=sfti1) not the generic venom page.

Infobox image issue

[edit]

- J Greb (talk) 05:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Green Goblin which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 14:29, 20 June 2013 (UTC) hey — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.26.204.56 (talk) 01:24, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Powers and abilities

[edit]

In his first appearances (Ditko, Romita) the Green Goblin had no super strength or speed beyond that of a normal, nimble, athletic man. Goblinshark17 (talk) 00:51, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image

[edit]

I don't know who picked it but you can't see a thing about the character, it needs replacing with something better. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 17:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, I did it myself. Darkwarriorblake / SEXY ACTION TALK PAGE! 17:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Harry Osborn green goblin

[edit]

Should the cover of amazing Spiderman 136 be added to the harry Osborn section? 75.22.17.130 (talk) 02:16, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great idea! Someone should do that! 2600:1700:DDD1:40:9C75:6C79:42DA:76A9 (talk) 23:31, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ball Goblin

[edit]

There needs to be a section about his alternate universe counterpart, Ball Goblin 193.115.97.242 (talk) 19:17, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox Image 2

[edit]

The infobox has been changed to a piece of work by Alex Ross which, while hyper realistic, is less clear and, IMO, less representative of the comic book character. It seems dark and very hard to see his facial features. I've reverted it to the version that's been in place for 21 months for now and am opening this discussion so people can decide if the old one should be retained or the new one. Which ever way people decide to go is fine but given this is the opening image everyone coming here will see, I think it needs more discussion than 0.

Thanks Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]