User talk:Goblinshark17

Welcome!

Hello, Goblinshark17, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking

if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! XLinkBot (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
A tutorial • Our five pillars • Getting mentored How to: Edit a page • Upload and use images • Create your first article Intuitive guide to Wikipedia • Article Creation Wizard
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Help desk: A Wiki Styled page to ask questions on Help directory: A comprehensive list-style help contents page
Policies and guidelines
Neutral point of view • No original research Verifiability • Reliable sources • Citing sources What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons List of policies • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • List of guidelines Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The community
Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The perfect article • Simplified manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Peer review • Featured content
Miscellaneous
User pages • Talk pages Awards a registered contributor can achieve and award Clean up: General • Spam • Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

March 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Josef Greindl has been reverted.
Your edit here to Josef Greindl was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_W7t3OUNB_U) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:15, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dietrich Fischer-Dieskau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James King (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 30 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Laurence Olivier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Boys from Brazil (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Opera videos

You seem to know a lot about singers' appearances on video. Please always add citations, and don't add personal view such as "sadly" ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:20, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mary Woronov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charlie's Angels (TV series). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Marcel Hillaire) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Marcel Hillaire, Goblinshark17!

Wikipedia editor Oiyarbepsy just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Just so you know, IMDB is not usually considered a reliable source. If would be helpful to add additional sources about Hillaire. Thanks.

To reply, leave a comment on Oiyarbepsy's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Nomination of Marcel Hillaire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Marcel Hillaire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Marcel Hillaire until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AussieLegend (✉) 10:56, 3 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kristinn Sigmundsson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nicholas Worth

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 13:59, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Magic Flute may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* Berger, William and David Foil (2006) ''The Magic Flute (Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart''. Black Dog Publishing. ISBN 1-57912-759-2.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:46, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Bringing in additional editorial eyes

In answer to your question at the bottom of this edit, there are a couple of ways to try to attract a few more editors to an article to resolve an editorial dispute. As MastCell notes, Wikipedia does not tend to do a terribly good job distinguishing between "supported by the preponderance of sources" and "supported by the most tenacious editors". There are a few things you can try, as outlined at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution. For this article, I would start by making a short, neutrally worded, descriptive post to Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard or Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine; editors interested in these sorts of topics often check these pages (and would probably appreciate your help on one or more open threads while you are there). Several people seem to be watching the article at the moment, but we shall see what happens over the next few weeks and months. Happy editing, - 2/0 (cont.) 11:38, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

George Tiller

Could you please stop adding false, unsourced information on George Tiller. That addiction part is not even mentioned in the source there. The Banner talk 07:16, 12 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY OK, I will repost it as "Struggle with substance abuse" instead of "Addiction".

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Magic Flute may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Sarastro instructs Pamina and Tamino to bid each other farewell before the greater trials ahead. (Trio: Sarastro, Pamina, Tamino – "''{{Lang|de|Soll ich dich, Teurer, nicht mehr sehn?}}''" (Note:
* Berger, William and David Foil (2006) ''The Magic Flute (Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart''. Black Dog Publishing. ISBN 1-57912-759-2.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:45, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Black Sunday (1977 film), but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Doniago. I wanted to let you know that I undid your recent edits to the Black Sunday (1977 film) plot summary because they added a significant amount of unneeded detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- DonIago (talk) 13:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Clarence Thomas. Thank you. Bbb23 (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

REPLY: Excuse me! My sources are the NY Daily News and CNN itself. How in the world can you say these are not reliable sources??? If CNN is not a reliable source, then no source is reliable. Goblinshark17 (talk) 18:24, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Erika Köth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Walter Berry. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Ekkehard Wlaschiha

added a link pointing to Peter Schneider

Lohengrin discography

added a link pointing to Peter Schneider

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Goblinshark17. You have new messages at Roscelese's talk page.
Message added 16:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

–Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 16:16, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United States Pro-life Movement

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Cloonmore (talk) 03:58, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Abzyme

added a link pointing to Cofactor

United States pro-life movement

added a link pointing to ATF

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

John Burt (anti-abortion activist)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Burt (anti-abortion activist), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.pensapedia.com/wiki/John_Burt.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:39, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United States pro-life movement is covered by WP:ARBAB and has a WP:1RR editing restriction

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

You are receiving this notice because you recently edited United States pro-life movement. Please be aware that a restriction is in effect for abortion-related articles limiting users to one revert per 24 hours (WP:1RR). Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

1RR on United States pro-life movement

GS, you're not allowed to make more than one revert a day on abortion-related articles. Would you mind self-reverting your recent edit? Juno (talk) 00:32, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Juno (talk) 00:45, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

Kuru (talk) 02:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As noted clearly above, you have broken the 1RR community sanction on United States pro-life movement. Kuru (talk) 02:36, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for how long?

Your block expires at 02:35 UTC on 14 October, 2014. EdJohnston (talk) 03:43, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

John Burt (anti-abortion activist)

added links pointing to David Gunn, Paul Hill, Michael Griffin and John Britton

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest/Noticeboard

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you. Juno (talk) 21:06, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SingingZombie, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Juno (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Juno (talk) 23:36, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marcel Hillaire

I've got important work still to do, but could you give the page a look over before I get to the bulk of his career? Whatever possessed you to start the page? It's a fascinating subject which deserves a fuller retelling than I have yet found sources to cover. BusterD (talk) 23:48, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

User blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:54, 23 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I can never be effectively blocked from Wikipedia. I live in a large city with thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of hot spots and internet cafes from which I can create virtually unlimited sock-puppets or edit anonymously.

If you want me not to edit Wikipedia, your best bet would be to ask me politely to refrain from doing so, and to try to persuade me to honor your request. I'm a pretty reasonable person, maybe persuasion will work! Goblinshark17 (talk) 03:49, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]