Talk:Greater Manchester

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Greater Manchester article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3

Greater Manchester is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 6, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
March 16, 2008	Peer review	Reviewed
July 19, 2008	Featured article candidate	Promoted
October 15, 2022	Featured article review	Demoted
Current status: Former featured article

This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

UK geography High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

England High‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greater Manchester Top‑importance

	Greater Manchester portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greater Manchester, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greater Manchester on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Greater ManchesterWikipedia:WikiProject Greater ManchesterTemplate:WikiProject Greater ManchesterGreater Manchester articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Geography Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Proposed merge of Greater Manchester Built-up Area into Greater Manchester

CLOSED

Reject merging of article(s) as per snow consensus against. GenQuest ^"scribble" 21:02, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This article pretty much just covers the wider county with small exceptions of a few towns and villages not in the county (IE Wilmslow, Glossop and Newton-le-Willows) but be better placed in the GM article and adding a bit to each non GM town and village about them being part of the BUA... DragonofBatley (talk) 14:52, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning to do the same with all the other Urban Area articles? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Urban_areas_of_England WatcherZero (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note that places like Wigan aren't in the BUA but are in the county. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - As others have said the Greater Manchester Buil-up area differs from Greater Manchester quite a bit in that it excludes Wigan and includes a few towns outside Greater Manchester. Eopsid (talk) 22:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Agree with points made above regarding Wigan etc. Also noting that articles on Built-Up Areas are typically more statistical in tone, as such is a different topic. FJones2123 (talk) 13:41, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - Its conflating a political entity with a statistical term just because they share the same descriptive name, e.g. An Eccles Cake isnt a cake despite having cake in the name. WatcherZero (talk) 18:21, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

FA sweeps

The article has some issues:

unsourced content has accumulated in places
non-hqrs sources such as Forbes contributors and press release from Marketing Manchester are cited
upon investigation I found and flagged failed verification issues in the demography section—have not examined the rest of the article
datedness such as "as of November 2012" has crept in.
At 10682 words, I don't think the article meets requirements for length and summary style. Some of the detail in the history section, for example, seems UNDUE.

The article will also need updating considering the 2021 UK census. (t · c) buidhe 20:50, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merger Proposal 8 December 2022

CLOSED

Agree to merging of article(s) per CONSENSUS. Entities are basically the same thing with slight differences, easily explained in the article. Interested party or proposer Chocolateediter should proceed with the merge. GenQuest ^"scribble" 04:47, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I propose merging Manchester City Region into Greater Manchester. They is no statutory body called Manchester City Region, the mayoral combined authority and local enterprise partnership are both named Greater Manchester which is the same name as the county. The LEP may have once been called the Manchester City Region LEP or a predecessor to the MCA, similar to South Yorkshire LEP, this is no longer the case. Leeds LEP and Liverpool LEP+MCA are the only ones I think continue to use the term city region in their names. Chocolateediter (talk) 16:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support - either merging here or to merge with Greater Manchester Combined Authority. Having an article on the city region implies that it is distinct from the combined authority which is not true (although the initial proposal was wider than the metropolitan county). The LEP is also being absorbed by the combined authority and renamed accordingly. -- M2Ys4U ^(talk) 09:49, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Cmnt: Pinging prior participants from recent similar merge request: @WatcherZero:, @DragonofBatley:, @Eopsid:, @FJones2123:, @Crouch, Swale:. GenQuest ^"scribble" 19:14, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support- I support a merge here or the article on the combined authority. The areas are the same. Would be different if they included more than just Greater Manchester but it doesnt. Eopsid (talk) 19:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Its a stub page but would make more sense to merge with the Manchester Combined Authority page than the County page. WatcherZero (talk) 19:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support it seems to have the same area as the county. Crouch, Swale (talk) 21:19, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't the city region something that covers parts of Lancashire Derbyshire and Cheshire though? DragonofBatley (talk) 23:24, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The Manchester City Region is a distinct entity with a different function, covering a much larger area than the metropolitan county or the Greater Manchester Combined Authority - see the maps in the articles. There is however some material in the article on the City Region that is actually about the Combined Authority, and it should probably be transferred to that article. --Helmshore (talk) 13:18, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reading the Manchester city region article, it originally had a couple extra districts in it but since 2009 has the same boundaries as Greater Manchester. Eopsid (talk) 12:09, 20 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Lead: population figures

There is a problem with the quoted population figures for the largest towns. Only Bolton ties in with the population in the Bolton article, and that figure is from 2011. There's a vast difference between the figure for Sale and Sale. No year is specified for any of the figures and as they are all unsourced, I'm removing them as potentially misleading. Rupples (talk) 12:18, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]