Talk:Great Hinckley Fire

Weather: Droughts / Wildfires Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Droughts and wildfires task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Wildfire Mid‑importance

	Great Hinckley Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Minnesota Mid‑importance

	Minnesota portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Death Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merger

The merger would be a good idea. Dr. Dan 17:40, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

four hours?

There is no possible way this fire burned 400 square miles in four hours. See the progress of the current BWCA fire even in high winds. I removed this bit of info from the article -Ravedave 17:22, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, this is documented, so it should be returned. 72.11.102.187 (talk) 18:45, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Size of fire

The article as written variously describes the final size of the Hinckley Fire as being 420 square miles (1,100 km²), 810 square kilometres (310 sq mi), and greater than 400 square miles (1,000 km²), while the single online reference says 480 square miles (1,200 km²)[1]. I realize that a historical event like this may not have an exact measurement, but does anyone have access to a more authoritative reference? -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Large quotation from Hinckley Fire Museum

Is the size of this quotation acceptable with regards to Wikipedia's policy on quotations, copyright, and use of non-free content? It seems pretty large -- perhaps we can work on paraphrasing and citing the Hinckley Fire Museum as an inline reference? -- BlueCanoe (talk) 18:24, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Great Hinckley Fire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:06, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Temperature inversion?

Sure this is correct? That the relatively cooler 1,100°C forest fire was trapped/capped by a layer of much hotter air above it? Doesn't really make sense... Leo 86.83.56.115 (talk) 14:06, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]