Talk:Greasestock

A fact from Greasestock appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 May 2008, and was viewed approximately 913 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Greasestock festival in New York showcases green technologies, such as vegetable-powered vehicles, solar vehicles, and organic farming exhibits?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/May.

Wikipedia

Environment

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Energy Mid‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state): Hudson Valley

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hudson Valley (assessed as Mid-importance).

CSD

I think this CSD nomination is inappropriate. The article is well-organized, the subject is notable, and sources are provided. Frank | talk 19:51, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator of this article, I agree the tag is erroneous. The article is ineligible for CSD A7 with sources from The New York Times and The Daily News. MrPrada (talk) 19:54, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Agree it should be kept. Itsmejudith (talk) 19:55, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm unsure this qualifies as notable. There is a lack of significant coverage of the topic, and there are errant/unsupported claims made. There are hundreds of such events in the country. It's claimed in the article that this is the largest event of its kind in the US, which is factually incorrect (the Midwest Renewable Energy Association Fair is), and the stated source does not confirm this claim either. The links are questionable, as there is substantial commercial content on them. I think DMOZ, the open directory, would better site from which to link this event.--E8 (talk) 20:03, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Then the appropriate place for you to take this would be prod (which I will decline), and then AfD. CSD A7 is incorrect. MrPrada (talk) 20:06, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Request withdrawn. The NYT article did not support the "largest" claim. Was that from another one of the sources?--E8 (talk) 20:09, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, it was from another website. After careful reading I think it was a bit of an exaggerated claim on their part. There are numerous sources for this, I will try and get some others up. MrPrada (talk) 20:11, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    - Ok, nice work. Apologies for not noticing your recent construction and templating you :/. I've reverted all related changes I made.--E8 (talk) 20:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
      - That's alright, I should have placed a {{underconstruction}} tag at the top of the page. Thank you for patrolling new pages, hopefully we can contribute and take this stub and make it even better. MrPrada (talk) 20:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I stand by my CSD nomination. The event had minimal attendance and was ephemeral, but proximity to notable publishers, timing, and a bit of promotional aptitude was all that was needed to establish notability. Further, since the initial CSD, notability guidelines have been adjusted and now require "significant coverage"; given that cited sources all parrot the same interview information (and use the exact same wording - they're covering PR, not the event), I question whether notability was ever established. I can list number of similar, niche events with 'significantly' larger attendance counts, decades of annual events, and that are ongoing, that can't crack the notability requirements; this was, and continues to be, a failure of the notability guidelines that is biased against areas that lack media coverage.E8 (talk) 04:22, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Greasestock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080529043219/http://www.greasestock.org/images/GreasestockMay08.jpg to http://www.greasestock.org/images/GreasestockMay08.jpg

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]