Jump to content

Talk:Grant Mitchell (EastEnders)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Question

[edit]

Are there any known plans for Grant Mitchell to make another return to EastEnders? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AlexWilkes (talk • contribs)

NO! Please stop asking! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:30, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is/was debate

[edit]

Until they kill the character off or unless Kemp retired etc we must assume he can return at any moment and therefore is an is not a was, SqueakBox 20:53, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Until we hear any confirmation that he will return, we must assume he's not going to, and therefore he is a was not an is. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you feel characters who have not died but have left the show should be refered to in present tense, please can you take it up at WP:WPEE. It was decided about a year ago to refer to them in past tense. As I've said elsewhere, soap operas are different to shows like Desperate Housewives or Lost and I feel different rules should apply. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 22:28, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I dont see any need to do that. Something decided a year ago can easily be changed now, please provide a diff for your claim. Or alternatively and much better give me a reputable source that Grant Mitchell was rather than is a character in EE, SqueakBox 21:18, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What claim? I know it can be easily changed, that's why I suggested taking it up with the Wikiproject. But actually, I don't think it would be that easy as there as many characters who have left and not died. Grant's gone to Portugal, isn't that enough? Yes he could return, and when we find out that he will return, we'll change it to "is". Until then, it should say as "was". — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 23:37, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well either you cite this or it will have to be rewritten, SqueakBox 23:44, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cite that he's left? Do you watch EastEnders? He's not in the cast anymore! — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 00:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Trust me, he's left. The citation for that is the fact that he no longer appears on screen in the show. He made a 3 month return; and no more plans have been announced - therefore he is a past character, who no longer appears in the show. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 01:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

All I get to watch is the video clips, SqueakBox 02:39, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Then listen to the people who watch it and are virtually experts on the show; he's not in it anymore. Trampikey (talk to me)(contribs) 11:09, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Storyline section

[edit]

What are everyones thoughts on the storyline section? Seems a little heavy on the 2005-2006 storylines to me. I was planning to extend the early stuff, but i'm not sure if that's wise now seeing as we just had to condense the Pauline one so much.Gungadin 17:08, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, God! Shh before we have to do any more work!! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Whoops, you're gonna kill me, I just asked Elonka to take a look. lol . I wanted to get an outsiders opinion. Dont hate me :)Gungadin 17:23, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, oh God, you're gonna hate Grant as much as you hate Pauline by the end of this! -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:24, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lol, I know, but we dont have to do any of the recommendations like with Pauline, as it isnt already a GA so it cant get demoted. I was just interested in seeing what could be done over a period of time, so it's something to work to.Gungadin 17:28, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I suppose. I really hope the peer review people don't rip Pauline to shreds (well, I suppose PRs never get done anyway) but the FA people might rip it to shreds... -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 17:34, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah that's what i'm dreading too. I think they will rip it to shreds to be honest, and they can be so patronising and picky too- like with the Lou one, which shouldnt have failed in my opinion. They can hardly say we have too much in the storyline section in that article.Gungadin 17:43, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, peer reviews and FA noms can be very stressful! But when you see an article that you've worked on, show up on the Wikipedia mainpage, trust me, it's all worth it.  :) As for my specific comments on this article: Yes, you guessed it, I'd like to see the storyline section edited down. And as a style thing, be careful about starting too many paragraphs with the character's first name. Scanning down the left column of the article, there are too many paragraphs that start with the word, "Grant." I'd also like to see the lead expanded, per WP:LEAD. Like instead of "short stints," get the actual dates, if not in the lead, then at least in the infobox. It's ironic that the article has more detail on the character's emotional state, then the actual real world dates of when he appeared. :) Whenever writing an article lead, on any subject, be sure to put right up at the top of the article why this particular character or subject is important, in a real-world context. With Pauline, it was obvious that she was a 22-year character. But with Grant, spell it out? What could you put in the lead that would make a non-fan say, "Okay, yes, this character is important enough to have an article." A good lead will also be a very concise summary of the entire article. Did you know that if you have MSN messenger, words in Instant Messages are linked to Wikipedia articles? You can hover over key words in any message, and it'll list the top couple paragraphs of the Wikipedia article, as a definition for that term. Think about what you'd like to appear, if someone hovered their mouse over the name "Grant Mitchell."  :) --Elonka 17:59, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automated peer review

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Elonka 18:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

[edit]

Unknown Return (2010)

[edit]

In early January 2010 alot of people keep putting Grant is returning to Eastenders for its 25th birthday. Because this as not been confirmed can people "STOP" changeing this profile. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.133.87.22 (talk) 15:47, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't seen anyone add it, at least not recently. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 19:56, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

First appearance episode number

[edit]

It was me who removed this as like Phil's it is inaccurate. The show was twice-weekly in the 1980s, meaning it's not possible that 1000+ episodes could've aired between February 1985 and February 1990. The 1000 episode aired in 1994 and was marked by Nigel and Debbie's wedding. This is referenced on both their pages I believe. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.18.214.210 (talk) 04:28, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've reverted my revert. –anemoneprojectors– 20:54, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 17 May 2016

[edit]

ross kemp says he's got a third return hes back in june and back again later in in the year (skip to 5 mins) 2A02:C7D:1FA4:F200:859:4167:B2E0:BC04 (talk) 21:43, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. anemoneprojectors 21:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grant Mitchell (EastEnders). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:20, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Grant Mitchell (EastEnders). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 25 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Grant Mitchell (EastEnders). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Grant Mitchell

[edit]

Hi I see you reverted edits on grant Mitchell because 2a02:c7c:a6a6:bb00:1888:4d42:4f6e:248f changed it to him returning. I have had to revert the article back once again. Is there anyway we can give this person a blockage or a warning to get him to stop disruptive editing by any chance?

Thanks. Adavid299 (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Grant_Mitchell_(EastEnders)&oldid=1253416255"