Talk:Granada Studios
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Move to Granada Studios?
[edit]The official name is The Manchester Studios but I've never heard it referred to by that name in person or in the media. All I ever hear is Granada Studios. I think there are grounds for renaming the page Granada Studios considering the name of the page does not have to be its "official" name: Wikipedia does not necessarily use the subject's "official" name as an article title; it instead uses the name that is most frequently used to refer to the subject in English-language reliable sources.
If it was the most "frequently used" it would be Granada Studios[1][2] hands down. Referring to the studios as the Quay Street Studios[3] is probably more common than The Manchester Studios. Discuss. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevo1000 (talk • contribs)
- I understand where you're coming from, but ITV and 3Sixty Media refer to them as The Manchester Studios in line with ITV's other studio complex's: The London Studios (LWT) and The Leeds Studios (Yorkshire). I therefore think that the should remain as the Manchester studios. I know that is what they are formally called, but a couple of redirects to the page should rectify that problem. Rafmarham (talk) 13:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- Although I like that the article is being referenced and expanded admirably, I do get an impression that some of the edits look a little too much like they are coming from one viewpoint, for example "Despite this renaissance..." and "will most likely be demolished despite being the first and oldest operating television studios in the United Kingdom". With regards to the article title, as they are currently called "The Manchester Studios", that should probably remain the title. Once ITV have moved to Salford, therefore losing the last link to this building, perhaps Granada Studios would then be a more suitable title? Bob talk 17:13, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
- I think the idea of changing the page to Granada Studios is the wisest solution once ITV move to Mediacity and the studios are closed. It was known as Granada Studios for the majority of its existance (44 years, 1956-2000) and the Manchester Studios for just over 10 years. Stevo1000 (talk) 14:43, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
- Rafmarhen's claim is incorrect. ITV refer to the Manchester Studios as being part of ITV Granada/Granada Studios on their website: http://www.itv.com/beontv/tickets/ That makes sense as the whole building isn't 3Sixy Media facilities as ITV Granada have news and administration departments based there. Therefore an article on the whole building should still be called Granada Studios.
Hstudent (talk) 19:54, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 21:47, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
The Manchester Studios → Granada Studios – I believe the Manchester Studios should be changed to Granada Studios due to a number of reasons:
1. The Manchester Studios is more commonly called Granada Studios
2. Granada Studios was the original name of the studios in 1956 Stevo1000 (talk) 05:38, 12 February 2012 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Assessment
[edit]This article needs to be assessed - it must come under the cover of at least one WikiProject. Also, I think this is certainly nearing GA status. An assessment may confirm this or at least say what else needs to be done. Rafmarham (talk) 13:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Granada Studios. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728065646/http://www.teletronic.co.uk/bernstein.htm to http://www.teletronic.co.uk/bernstein.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111209004310/http://www.gforcemag.com/2010/remembered-granada-studios/ to http://www.gforcemag.com/2010/remembered-granada-studios/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717051915/http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/studio%20history.htm to http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/studio%20history.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160412055210/http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/rest%20of%20britain.htm to http://www.tvstudiohistory.co.uk/rest%20of%20britain.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Now demolished
[edit]The article needs to be rewritten, since Granada studios was demolished 2 years ago. It's currently a building site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:A442:581E:1:66E8:8918:394C:2832 (talk) 10:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
- As the article discusses, parts of the complex were demolished. However, significant elements remain, so it is not accurate to say that it "was demolished 2 years ago" Tvcameraop (talk) 12:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)