Talk:Gorgon gas project

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemical and Bio Engineering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Chemical and Bio EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject Chemical and Bio EngineeringChemical and Bio Engineering articles

Australia: Western Australia Mid‑importance

	Australia portal Gorgon gas project is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Western Australia (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Western Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Energy Low‑importance

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

explanation of recent changes

after a large number of edits by another editor earlier today (thanks), I've done some fixes and thought I should offer an explanation:

shifted Project proponents further up in the article - felt it was important to mention WHO is doing the project earlier on
deleted subheadings for 'Project Cost' and also 'Benefits'. Estimated project capital costs, at this stage, are just one or two sentences. Doesn't seem to warrant its own sub. Same for estimated benefits. I feel only a few bullets are warranted, and included inthe project scope section. Of course the EIS documents specify benefits runnung to several pages, but placing the bulk of them into the article will possibly make it look like a promotion of the subject. In any event, what they represent are not facts about past events, rather merely the results of a forecasting process of a 30-year future time horizon predicated on numerous assumptions. Not exactly encyclopedic stuff. Still - they get referred to in most of the press reports (usually mis-reported) so maybe okay to provide the actual highlights from the original document, which is what I've done here
domestic gas sales - changed subheading because there are no domestic sales yet. Likely to be some time off - so I think best to refer to the domestic gas as just a future phase of the project
changed 'controversy' to 'criticisms' and added some items. There's sure to be controversy in relation to this project over time, but at this stage, the items are probably best described as criticisms - even though they may indeed be 'controversial'; the term itself seems less applicable. Also - The final couple of sentences added earlier today by someone else needed fixing for grammar, readability and context etc.
I converted the remaining citations added by the previous editor into the proper format
Re: enviro criticisms: I removed the clause "because the project could have been built on the mainland", for various reasons, including semantic logic (i.e. the development doesnt yet exist so it couldnt HAVE BEEN built anywhere, yet. Semantics aside - as it stood, that specific clause was not a verifiable fact. If someone wants to incorporate something about the ISSUE relating to the siting of the plant (i.e. Barrow v mainland) - please go ahead. I just can't be bothered right now.
finally - my apologies - a 'before and after' comparison is probably made difficult by my 'structural' changes. Hope this all makes sense. Cheers. GlenDillon 11:54, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is Justin with Chevron Corporation. I'm hoping to work within the community guidelines to update inaccurate informaiton on this page and add additional detail including recently signed supply deals. I'd like to get the blessing of the editors that oversee this page before moving forward.

best, Justin

What effect will this have on gas prices within Australia? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.253.148.170 (talk) 12:46, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.offshore-technology.com/projects/gorgon/
Triggered by \boffshore-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 12:13, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gorgon gas project. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]