Talk:Google Earth/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dreamy Jazz (talk · contribs) 22:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Promote: The article is well written and has clearly laid out sections. Prose is clear and concise, no spelling/grammar mistakes, complies with manual of style, it is verifiable, no original research, valid refs, all refs from reliable sources, no copyright violations (no article and images), can't find any plagiarism, it addresses the topic well, does not go into unnecessary detail, it is broad in sub-topics covered and does not focus on one particular sub-topic. Neutral style and is a stable article (only sometimes vandalism by unregistered or new users occurs). Well illustrated, but does not overuse images. Images are properly tagged and have valid fair use rationales (if needed). The images are also relevant to the topic. Dreamy Jazz (talk) 21:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Dreamy Jazz: Thanks! Any specific suggestions before you decide? Bruzer Fox 19:53, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]