Talk:Good for Me (song)

Fair use rationale for Image:Good For Me single.PNG

Image:Good For Me single.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:27, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move. While there are only WP:TWODABS, as the nominator says, the fact that the two articles have basically equivalent page views despite this one being at the base title is a good indication that it's not the primary topic. The article will be moved to the proposed title Good for Me (song) as there aren't any other articles on songs of the name. Cúchullain ^t/c 14:50, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good for Me → Good for Me (song) – The Amy Grant song is as popular as someone else's album. Despite the song's success at the time, I could not see how the song is more significant than the album, especially due to song's insufficient worldwide recognition. WP:TWODABS would decide, but I think neither is primary. George Ho (talk) 15:01, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Good for Me (Amy Grant song) since per WP:DAB 2 other songs are mentioned in album articles, I just made Good for Me (disambiguation). In ictu oculi (talk) 17:25, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Good for Me (Amy Grant song) and replace with the disambiguation page -- 76.65.128.222 (talk) 12:16, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Good for Me (Amy Grant song) per WP:NCM (recently confirmed by WP:DAB). --Richhoncho (talk) 18:30, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Good for Me (Amy Grant song) and move Good for Me (disambiguation) to Good for Me. Dicklyon (talk) 06:26, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as proposed, in the absence of another article on a song by this name. --BDD (talk) 17:44, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Songs covered by / mentioned by album articles?

@Cuchullain: @George Ho: @76.65.128.222: @Richhoncho: @Dicklyon: @BDD:: Whether or not whether other songs have standalone articles or are just mentions, and what WP:DAB says/means, is a subject of discussion at WT:DAB.

latest post here. In ictu oculi (talk) 23:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I would prefer the fully disambiguated title, with the partially disambiguated title (this current title) redirecting to the disambiguation page, as other articles cover other songs as subtopics. 00 70.24.244.158 (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User:BarrelProof has commented (in reply to link above) that the footnote is actually there at WP:DAB, I missed it. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:29, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@George Ho: Hi ...I think it'd be better to ask closer before opening a new one. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:13, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Good for Me (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5mpzL5EW5?url=http%3A%2F%2Flongboredsurfer.com%2Fcharts.php%3Fyear%3D1992 to http://longboredsurfer.com/charts.php?year=1992

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]