Talk:Good Year for the Roses

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedy deleted as being recently created, having no relevant page history and duplicating an existing English Wikipedia topic, because... (your reason here) --Besmircher (talk) 15:24, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's better! It provides much more detailed perspective. It's more informative. It intrigues the listener to actually go check out the artists and the song. Aren't these things the whole point of the enterprise?

You don't create a whole new article for that, you fix the existing one. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 16:06, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Good Year for the Roses which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 00:02, 4 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion may now be seen at Talk:A Good Year for the Roses. There was consensus to Move. EdJohnston (talk) 02:20, 27 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]