Talk:Good Humor
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Flavor Change?
[edit]Has Unilever changed the ingredients in Good Humor/Popsicle products? I had a Push-Pop earlier today with the Unilever logo printed on it, and it wasn't nearly as good as I remembered them from my childhood... hard and icy, rather than soft and sweet. Maybe it was coincidental, but if other consumers have noticed a change to the recipe of these products, I'd like to hear about it. --M.Neko 05:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
Old logo
[edit]Unilever has changed the logo to the Heartbrand style for all markets. I don't no if it's legal to use the brand owned logo, because wikipedia content must be public domain?! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.83.200.97 (talk)
- Actually, fair use guidelines mean that we are allowed to use the logo. --Daysleeper47 21:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Goodhumr.gif
[edit]Image:Goodhumr.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:37, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
You guys did not mention Langnese with one word...
[edit]But it's obvious the 1960's Langnese logo (which is no longer used) and the Good Humor one are a "bit" alike, huh? Check this old logo from German WP. -andy 77.7.114.74 (talk) 12:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
- Langnese is just an extension of the Good Humor brand, as used in Germany. It appears to go by many different names in several different countries. The same brand is called Wall's in the UK, and Ola in the Netherlands, and both also use the same heart-swirl logo, as well as the old "blue circle on red stripes" one before that. --H Hog (talk) 15:26, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Wrong info on page
[edit]The first paragraph of the article claims Good Humor is an American ice cream brand. It is, however, a Unilever brand and hence NOT American. Would someone please edit it properly? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.127.200.59 (talk) 19:05, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
- technically, it is an American brand as it is from the US. Same idea that 7-eleven is an American brand while now being owned by 7-Eleven Japan. rektz (talk) 14:16, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class Food and drink articles
- Mid-importance Food and drink articles
- WikiProject Food and drink articles
- B-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- B-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- B-Class Ohio articles
- High-importance Ohio articles
- WikiProject Ohio articles
- B-Class Youngstown articles
- High-importance Youngstown articles
- WikiProject Youngstown articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- B-Class company articles
- Low-importance company articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- B-Class Brands articles
- Unknown-importance Brands articles
- WikiProject Brands articles