Talk:Gojong sillok

Korea Low‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by one or more inactive working groups.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Proposed merge of Sunjong sillok with Gojong sillok

Given that these articles currently have nearly identical content, it seems like it may be more appropriate to merge them. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 01:58, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Back when the redirects were created in 2008, there was a section entitled Gojong and Sujong sillok, at it might be worth merging the two pages into a joint page, given that their history is similar. Two emperors, but the annals have a similar history. Perhaps Phoenix7777, who created them as separate pages, might like to comment. Klbrain (talk) 17:31, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been notified to the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Korea#Proposed merge of Sunjong sillok with Gojong sillok.―― Phoenix7777 (talk) 12:39, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to the Veritable Records of the Joseon Dynasty page. These two stubs are only repeating what is said in the main article. Moreover, there is no separate article for any other sillok. Pldx1 (talk) 00:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirecting, rather than merging, as there is no unique content to merge. Klbrain (talk) 16:49, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]