Talk:Goff–Gratch equation

Physics Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Weather Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 09:53, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is this right?

I changed the values of the triple point pressure and temperature, but now I wonder if that's the right thing to do. If Goff-Gratch used those values when estimating the other constants, then putting more accurate values for the triple point pressure and temperature will give possibly less accurate results for the vapor pressure of ice. PAR (talk) 23:30, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Correct formulation?

It says in the article: "e*st is e* at the steam-point pressure (1 atm = 1013.25 hPa)" Shouldn't it say "e*st is e* at the steam-point temperature (1 atm = 1013.25 hPa)"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 138.227.189.8 (talk) 13:40, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]