Talk:Godfrey Weitzel

Fair use rationale for Image:New Orleans Fleur de Lis.gif

Image:New Orleans Fleur de Lis.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:51, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

I removed the lines "...where later Weitzel would become hated" and "However, Weitzel would become caught in controversy..." because neither leads anywhere in the article. Weitzel's military service in Louisiana is later mentioned, but no elaboration on why he should be more hated there than any other occupier. Similarly, the paragraph about the settlement controversy fingers Lincoln as the controversial figure, without specifying any Weitzel involvement beyond, once more, simply being there. (I also edited out an extraneous line about Confederate participants, which similarly led nowhere.)

I did however leave "After Lincoln's death, Secretary of War Edwin Stanton refused to believe the generous terms on which Lincoln would have allowed Virginia to rejoin the Union", although it too is currently irrelevant, to give other editors a framework on which to rebuild the undeveloped point I deleted.

Although as written both of these passages interfere with the readability of the article, I suspect the original writer(s) referred to defensible historic points; if anybody wants to re-introduce and elaborate on them, they'll likely enhance the article. Cheers. Laodah 23:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Godfrey Weitzel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080208215607/http://www.generalsandbrevets.com/ngw/weitzel.htm to http://www.cincinnaticwrt.org/data/ccwrt_history/talks_text/mowery_weitzel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:31, 13 January 2017 (UTC)