Talk:Gobannus

Celts Low‑importance

	Gobannus is within the scope of WikiProject Celts, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the ancient Celts and the modern day Celtic nations. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article or you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks or take part in the discussion. Please Join, Create, and Assess.CeltsWikipedia:WikiProject CeltsTemplate:WikiProject CeltsCelts articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mythology Low‑importance

	Mythology portal This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rome, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the city of Rome and ancient Roman history on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomeWikipedia:WikiProject RomeTemplate:WikiProject RomeRome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move from Gobannus to Gobanos?

I have a few reasons for suggesting a move to Gobanos. First, our two instances resembling Gobannus are two inscriptions written COBANNO with an initial C and a normal first-declension dative singular. Now, it's become customary for many English writers to restore a first declension Gaulish nominative in -os rather than its Latin counterpart in -us. Furthermore, the Berne zinc tablet gives us the equivalent of a G in the form of Γ. Finally, the Centre for Advanced Welsh and Celtic Studies reconstructs the proto-Celtic word for 'smith' as “ *goban- (?) ”, with a long or short a that I can't find a Unicode character for at the moment. In other words, they seem to lean towards a single n as well. Not a huge deal, but what do people think? Quartier Latin1968 17:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

makes sense. the question is, do we want articles titled after reconstructed names (see also Talk:Wōdanaz). Gobanos should in any case be a redirect at least. I suppose the Proto-Celtic (or early Gaulish; 400 BC?) god was called Gobanos, the Gallo-Roman one (AD 200?) Gobannus. dab (ᛏ) 06:40, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I concur with the reasoning above, better to move to Gobanos and the redirect Cobannus to it --Nantonos 23:27, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal

"a bronze cauldron dedicated to Deus Cobannos, in the late 1980s and illegally exported to the USA" says the article, but the footnote refers to an inscription on a tablet: CA.Malibu.JPGM.L.96.AB.54. Perhaps in the enthusiasm of tarring the Getty with the "illegal" part, the actual object got lost?--Wetman (talk) 22:48, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This statue was found in 1977 in CUAN near NEVERS (France) by M. COLAS by night... Yes, it's illegal and without the "GETTY trafic" this statue still stay in France... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.100.205.189 (talk) 20:02, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bern as Brenodor?

I know that the official reason for the Bern's name is that almost mythlogical story with the "bear", but, is it me or the name Brenodor sounds like Bern? Maybe is in fact the ancient name of the city! Bigshotnews 17:19, 11 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bigshotnews (talk • contribs)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gobannus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060904175755/http://usepigraphy.brown.edu/view.php?textID=CA.Malibu.JPGM.L.96.AB.54 to http://usepigraphy.brown.edu/view.php?textID=CA.Malibu.JPGM.L.96.AB.54

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:58, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]