Talk:Glorious Purpose (Loki season 1)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glorious Purpose (Loki season 1) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Television: Episode coverage / Marvel Cinematic Universe Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.
	This article is supported by the Marvel Cinematic Universe task force (assessed as High-importance).

Comics: Marvel Bottom‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Bottom	This article has been rated as Bottom-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Stained glass image

Herron debunks any speculation that the image was meant to be Mephisto here (this also can be used). Should this be mentioned at all, and if so where? The Writing section? - Favre1fan93 (talk) 21:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt this is relevant for now. —El Millo (talk) 21:31, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah...no. – ChannelSpider (talk) 15:28, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the Mephisto side of things has ended up being that big of a deal, but could still be worth mentioning the design of the stained glass in general. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:57, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any additional (guest) cast?

Currently, we are just listing Hunter U-92 as he was really the only named additional cast member. Based on the credits/what happens in the episode, I wanted to gauge thoughts on possibly including Flight Attendant - Erika Coleman, Martin - Josh Fadam, or French Boy - Raphael Luce. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 01:07, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd only add Josh Fadem as Martin, since he's the only named character played by an actor notable enough for his own article. —El Millo (talk) 01:55, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with the current listing. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. connection

Is it worth mentioning? Kailash29792 (talk) 12:47, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Kailash29792: Not really, sounds like just run-of-the-mill theories to be honest. IronManCap (talk) 13:33, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Either it was a continuity error not mentioning that Coulson was alive during AoS, or Marvel Studios refusing to consider that series canon. Kailash29792 (talk) 14:56, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Any future official statements from Marvel/Feige on Agents of SHIELD as noncanon would be interesting to include, but I think Inverse is just digging dirt from nothing here. IronManCap (talk) 15:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and also multiverse is still happening in the MCU and that means new timelines with their own long history (due to time travel creating new branches earlier in time). So, AOS could end up in any of those timelines. TVA could also be lying to Loki about the singular timeline. Organizations like those always have a hidden agenda. So, it's premature to jump to "continuity error" or "non-canon" conclusions. — Starforce¹³ 15:32, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not mentioning that he was brought to life does not mean he wasn't. The episode definitely doesn't confirm anything that we didn't know already. - adamstom97 (talk) 20:03, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exactly. Just baseless theorising on Inverse's part. IronManCap (talk) 20:25, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Titmouse

https://twitter.com/iamkateherron/status/1403793556083515393 This source here confirmed by Kate Herron that Titmouse was the one that did the animation on Miss Minutes. 66.186.255.243 (talk) 00:42, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This has been added. - adamstom97 (talk) 06:13, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hiding "Marketing" section

is there a consensus on why the Marketing section is removed? – ChannelSpider (talk) 13:54, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Marketing section is hidden because it doesn't have any content. It's only one unfinished sentence prepared to be filled when info actually is made available, assuming it will be similar to previous series. —El Millo (talk) 18:01, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The info has now been added. It looks like the reveals are going to be on Fridays given the Wednesday episode drops, not Mondays. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]