Talk:Globalization in Question

This page was proposed for deletion by RadioFan (talk · contribs) on 24 January 2010 with the comment:
unencyclopedic essay
It was contested by Msrasnw (talk · contribs) on 2010-01-24

Economics Low‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Books

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	It is requested that a picture or pictures be included in this article to improve its quality.

Removed PROD

Removed deletion prod. I think the article accurately and neutrally reports the content of the work. The work is one of the most noted works in the globalization literature. How precisely should the article be improved? Which bits are judged to be problematic? (Msrasnw (talk) 20:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

"one of the best and most iconoclastic attempts yet at mapping the new global economy." Will Hutton, The Observer (Msrasnw (talk) 12:30, 29 January 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Agree completely with the removal of the PROD; the article in not an "unencyclopedic essay". However, it could use some more references, particularly detailing its impact. A list of reviews is good, but a discussion of what they say would be even better. HairyWombat 02:44, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]