This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cemeteries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cemeteries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CemeteriesWikipedia:WikiProject CemeteriesTemplate:WikiProject CemeteriesCemeteries articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
There's no need for the Glenwood Cemetary Mortuary Chapel to have its own entry. The building is part of the cemetary and the description of the structure is more detailed in this entry. Bangabandhu (talk) 06:18, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would argue against merger. The chapel itself is on the NHRP; the rest of the cemetery is not. If this article has a more detailed chapel description, then it should be more over to the Chapel article. That's an editing issue, not (to my mind) an argument for merger. - Tim1965 (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]