Talk:Glenbrook Lagoon

This article was nominated for deletion on 23 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep (nomination withdrawn).

Australia: Sydney Low‑importance

	Australia portal Glenbrook Lagoon is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Lakes

	Lakes portal Glenbrook Lagoon is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contradict

The article states that the lagoon is surrounded by suburban housing, and also states it is surrounded by bushland. Which is it? -- Whpq (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at the aerial view in [1] and you'll see that both are true, for slightly flexible definitions of "surround". dramatic (talk) 10:59, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the aerial view. I would say that the immediate surroundings are urban development. I'm removing the description of brush land. If therre is strenuous opposition, then it can always be put back in. -- Whpq (talk) 11:37, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peer Review

I would like the changes which i have made to this wikipedia article to be reviewed. I also believe that my citing of references needs to be corrected. I would also like to know if there are any areas of the article to which i should add more information. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rwetsteyn (talk • contribs) 08:31, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]