Talk:Glen Brunman

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 27 July 2014 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

Vaguely Connected Contributor

Glen Brunman was my boss when I worked at Epic Records 25 years ago. 25! I've seen him once since then. I'm noting it here in the interest of full disclosure. Julie 22:05, 27 July 2014 (UTC)JSFarman (talk)

Referencing thoughts

This is a stylistic matter, not a technical one. I accepted the draft knowing that there are areas where, as a matter of legibility, it can be accused of having borderline WP:CITEKILL. We write articles containing referenced facts with one audience in mind: the reader. My opinion is that a maximum cluster of a pair of references is usually more than enough for any fact, and that the extra reference(s) may well be able to be repurposed to cite different facts. Otherwise the greater number of references tends to overwhelm or impede readability.

I'm raising this as my own view and noting the fact that I chose to disregard it on acceptance. Fiddle Faddle 19:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddle Faddle I agree. I'm going to get rid of some of the references. (I got lost in the research, some of which fascinated me - I forgot that not every reader is going to be as interested in the media history of Bruce Springsteen as I am.) Thanks for the input. Julie JSFarman (talk) 01:26, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Glen Brunman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140418215130/http://www.sony.com/SCA/company-news/press-releases/sony-columbia-records/2014/glee-the-music-celebrating-100-episodes-available-.shtml to http://www.sony.com/SCA/company-news/press-releases/sony-columbia-records/2014/glee-the-music-celebrating-100-episodes-available-.shtml

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:02, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]