Talk:Glamour Awards

Controversies

I would propose this entire sections removal, as the articles own list shows no award ever being issued to the woman in question in the first place, and there being no sources to prove she was ever awarded the award, bar news articles from 2015 of the husband claiming to be returning the award.

A Google search, when filtered to only show results published prior to 1 January 2015, shows no legitimate results for a search with both the terms "Moira Smith" and either of the terms "Glamour" or "Woman of the Year".

118.208.71.246 (talk) 04:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Washington Post is a solid source. It appears that prior to 2003 the award was given in a much more low-key and unpublicized manner. Cla68 (talk) 05:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Glamour Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:14, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Glamour Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:49, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Years 2002 and 2016?

No Awards in these years? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.85.174.135 (talk) 17:35, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2017 Woman of the Year

The article lists "Bruce Jenner" as "women of the year 2017". This is not supported by the source, and also seems rather unlikely to me, given that Caitlyn Jenner won woman of the year in 2015 and that the editor seems to have deliberately used her deadname. I have removed this entry. 86.20.9.172 (talk) 17:43, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Needs updating

Has not been updated since 2017. Is anybody interested in maintaining this? It's not one of my subjects, so do not want to get involved in this one. E x nihil ^(talk) : Ex nihil (talk) 11:00, 4 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]