Talk:Give Me Everything

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Music / Hispanic and Latino Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Music portal This article is supported by WikiProject American music (assessed as Low-importance).
	Hispanic and Latino Americans portal This article is supported by the Hispanic and Latino Americans task force (assessed as Low-importance).

#1 or #4?

This article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_number-one_singles_from_the_2010s_(UK)#2011 says that it is the UK #1 single dated 22 May 2011, but this article says #4. has this article not been updated or is the #1's of 2011 Article wrong? calvin999 (talk) 17:50, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CD single

The CD Single listed in the article is the one released in France, isn't it? Johnnyboytoy (talk) 03:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 15 March 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Move to Give Me Everything. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 09:34, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– One of the best-selling singles of all time, vs. a barely notable 70s song that's been viewed less than 400 times all year,[1][2][3] vs. an even less-known song which doesn't even have an article. Seems like there's only one outcome. Unreal7 (talk) 20:32, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose WP:RECENT and WP:Naming conventions music per Give Me Everything (Magazine song). In ictu oculi (talk) 18:18, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What naming conventions? That's a red link. Anyway, this song's four years old and has sold almost 10 million copies worldwide. Not recentism at all. But even if it was, neither of the other two things are the slightest bit notable. Unreal7 (talk) 20:35, 16 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Still recent, Give Me Everything (Magazine song) still exists, (Pitbull song) is still nothing but beneficial to readers. In ictu oculi (talk) 18:11, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It would be beneficial if the other song had any notability or relevance, which it doesn't. Unreal7 (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose artist name doesn't hurt 76.120.162.73 (talk) 20:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Who said it hurt? The point is that it's unnecessary given how well-known it is. Unreal7 (talk) 23:36, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - it's as if WP:CONCISE doesn't even exist to some people. Red Slash 03:34, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Red Slash: WP:CONCISE doesn't come into it, because it's a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC issue. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Right, but primary topic is mind-numbingly obvious given pageviews and long-term significance (charting, etc.). The argument I was specifically referring to was "(Pitbull song) is still nothing but beneficial to readers"; I assumed (incorrectly?) that the claim to primary topic would already be conceded by any reasonable observer. Red Slash 22:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:PRECISE, WP:TITLECHANGES, WP:NCM et al. Editors who say we should ignore should ignore rules can't also complain rules are being ignored. See here. What was the word I was looking for? Does it sound like Hippopotamus? Or something similar? --Richhoncho (talk) 01:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and consider deleting the dab page per WP:2DABS. The Pitbull song article got 16,000 views in the last 90 days; there's a clear primary topic here. –Chase (talk / contribs) 01:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I tried researching the 1970s song a bit to try to gauge relative notability, but I couldn't get much info on it, other than the lyrics. It's not even clear what positions it charted at, in which countries. Hence I'll have to go with the nominator's assertion that the Pitbull song, which charted number 1 in many countries, is a primary topic, even taking recentism into acccount. Thanks — Amakuru (talk) 13:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't a WP:TWODABS there are 3 songs. In ictu oculi (talk) 17:34, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TWODABS says, "If there are two or three other topics, it is still possible to use a hatnote which lists the other topics explicitly." It also says "if this would require too much text ... then it is better to create a disambiguation page and refer only to that". I don't see it being an issue if we were to do something like this:

This article is about the Pitbull song. For the Magazine song, see Give Me Everything (Magazine song). For the Ben Christophers song, see Ben Christophers.

That is, of course, if we make the Pitbull song primary, which it should be. (The Magazine song doesn't appear to be notable and the other one doesn't even have an article.) –Chase (talk / contribs) 17:47, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. TWODABS applies here. -- Calidum 23:50, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:TWODABS and WP:PTOPIC Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:40, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and delete the dab page. Clear primary topic in a WP:TWODABS situation. The supposed third entry on the dab page wasn't even mentioned in the linked article.--Cúchullain ^t/c 16:30, 1 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - it's been almost a month now and consensus is clear. Unreal7 (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to WP:RM... Red Slash 20:05, 5 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support - Obvious case of primary topic here. --Yaksar (let's chat) 17:27, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Give Me Everything. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:28, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 21 external links on Give Me Everything. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:17, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Give Me Everything. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://planetpit.com/2011/03/29/release-date-for-pitbulls-planet-pit-album-announced/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://planetpit.com/2011/04/05/pitbull-ne-yo-and-nayer-at-mtv-spring-break-2011-in-las-vegas-photo/
Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/album/give-me-everything-feat-ne/id428086874
Corrected formatting/usage for http://austriancharts.at/2011_single.asp
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120306185017/http://www.fimi.it/dett_comunicatistampa.php?id=215 to http://www.fimi.it/dett_comunicatistampa.php?id=215
Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/give-me-everything-feat-ne/id428086874
Corrected formatting/usage for http://gfa.radioandrecords.com/publishGFA/GFANextPage.asp?sDate=04%2F16%2F2011&Format=1
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.sonymusic.de/Pitbull/Give-Me-Everything/P/2555078/B/88697939232

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:40, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Give Me Everything. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110424233318/http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/74353/week-ending-april-10-2011-songs-its-katys-world/ to http://new.music.yahoo.com/blogs/chart_watch/74353/week-ending-april-10-2011-songs-its-katys-world/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:19, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]