Talk:Gisele Yashar

Gisele Yashar has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 20, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 18 March 2012 by reviewer Alpha Quadrant (talk · contribs).

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Copy edit

@Aoba47: I have started copy editing, although it is a high quality article with not a lot that needs doing to it. I did rewrite "For the mission, Yashar draws from her background as a Mossad agent through using her experience with interrogation, weapons, and retrieval." I did as a single edit, so it can be reverted if you wish.

A query: "and are rarely given focus on their own" seems a little clunky to me; I read it as "of their own" the first time through and thought that it needed an 'a'. But as it is a summary of a quote I can't really change it, lest I lose the meaning. It works fine as it is, but would something like "and are rarely brought into focus as individuals" read a little more smoothly?

Another. The last paragraph: it seems a little odd to open the critics appraisals of her performance with one written 4 years after the character was killed off. I feel that this sentence would be best moved to the end to give a critical retrospective to end the article. Gog the Mild (talk) 11:03, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I will address your concerns momentarily. Aoba47 (talk) 18:00, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For the third comment, if you look at the citations, you will notice that a majority of the critical feedback written about the character and the actress' performance due to the surge of interest in Gadot following her role as Wonder Woman. Hope that makes sense. I have addressed and revised the second comment. Thank you again! Aoba47 (talk) 18:06, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That makes perfect sense, as is flagged up in the same way in the article. I will have a last go through tomorrow with fresh eyes and then I am done. As I said at the start, there hasn't really been much for a copy editor to do. Gog the Mild (talk) 19:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the response! Aoba47 (talk) 20:04, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox image and other image

I have reverted these edits as they violate the non-free content criteria and are not an improvement to the article. I've restored the previous infobox image as a better depiction. A second non-free video clip is not justified as redundant to the infobox image as being an image of the character (WP:NFCC#3). -- Whpq (talk) 13:41, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]