Talk:Giant oil and gas fields

Can someone tell me what the box means, "This article or section may contain an unpublished synthesis of published material that conveys ideas not attributable to the original sources." It's been two years since I posted articles here - at that time, this box did not show up. It's confusing, because the references for this article actually all do pertain to the topic quite directly. --Austinbirdman (talk) 23:24, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The box was added by editor User:Carados. I must agree with him, the original parts of the article read more like an essay synthesizing new conclusions from provided sources than an encyclopedia article which reports the sources.

I feel that I must emphasize original parts because several paragraphs of the article aren't original -- they're copy-pasted, in probable violation of copyright, with only minor changes to the opening sentences, from the middle of the report at Paul Mann's site. Those paragraphs should be removed immediately. You can use the references as a source of ideas and information, but not as a source of sentences. -- ArglebargleIV (talk) 23:39, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for not replying sooner. When I tagged this article, it seemed that it was orginal research that cited sources, and that did seem like the most appropriate tag to use. -Carados (talk) 01:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanations - I'll try to address them with a revision this morning. I heard Mann give a presentation on this topic in 2006. I'm going to rewrite the sections that come straight from the summary on his research pages (they are in the public domain, not copyrighted, but yes, they ought to be redone by all means). Then I'll try to remove any aspects that sound like syntheses - the heart of this piece is just reporting the work of Mann, Horn, Cross et al., which follows on the well known work of Halbouty in categorizing giant oil and gas fields. So this entry should exist (when complete) as one that reports material from sources rather than one that adds a new synthesis. --Austinbirdman (talk) 14:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

http://www.offshore-technology.com/features/feature-largest-oil-fields-world-gulf-uae/
Triggered by \boffshore-technology\.com\b on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 13:10, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II ^Notify_Online 21:28, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]