Talk:Ghurid invasion of Bengal

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup.

Military history: Asian / South Asia / Medieval / Early Muslim

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Asian military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)
	Early Muslim military history task force (c. 600 – c. 1600)

WP:RAJ

@Kjhll, please read WP:RAJ. Majumdar's sources cannot be used in Wikipedia. Ajayraj890 (talk) 15:33, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

kindly explain what do you mean Kjhll (talk) 16:01, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What is your problem? You are continuously removing citations you have no authority to remove sources Kjhll (talk) 16:02, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are many articles which use majumdar's article.If you remove sources you will be informed to administer for your reverted edits Kjhll (talk) 16:05, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly, if you wish, you can inform the administrator. They will handle the situation similarly to me. I kindly request that you maintain a polite tone in our conversation. Phrases like "What is your problem" are not welcomed. Returning to the main issue, I want to reiterate that sources prior to 1947 are not permissible due to WP:RAJ. This point has been consistently emphasized in my revisions. If you have any personal concerns regarding our interactions, I encourage you to consult with an administrator or experts, as they will provide the same response. Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:19, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

But there are WP:RAJ did not say sources prior to 1947 can't be used. You perhaps didn't read. There are list of some writers but where is Majumdar?? Kjhll (talk) 16:22, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You are continuously giving unreliable information, WP:RAJ didn't say anything about prior to 1947. Kjhll (talk) 16:25, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Read this talk section. I am tired of explaining this. @Sitush have clearly explained this. Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If I give citations not prior to 1947 ?acceptable or not? Kjhll (talk) 16:39, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the source. I am not the one who decides the reliability of the sources. You can seek help from here. I am just doing things I have learnt so far. Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The source you removed from the article was not prior to 1947. But I can give source which was not prior to 1947. The source clearly explains which was written in the article. I'll add it you can check. Kjhll (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The History of Bengal Vol.1 was published in 1943. And yes, you can add new citations following WP:RS. Ajayraj890 (talk) 16:57, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you add those again? I told you that it was firstly published on 1943. Therefore it comes under WP:RAJ. Don't be confused with later editions. Ajayraj890 (talk) 03:49, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It was published in 1971 did not you notice? Kjhll (talk) 03:53, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First published in 1943 but it was published in 1971. Editors like you can't give others to edit any article? Kjhll (talk) 03:54, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See the book is published in 1971 Kjhll (talk) 03:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The Book you mentioned was published by Daaca University in 1943. This book is published in 1971 by G. BHARDWAJ CALCUTTA and the name of the book is also different. Check it there is no problem to add this as source Kjhll (talk) 04:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The year of first publication matters. Don't edit the page while it is under discussion. Ajayraj890 (talk) 04:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

check it. The first publication of the mentioned year 1971. Kjhll (talk) 04:35, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am not giving personal statement. The link of the book mentioned the first year Kjhll (talk) 04:34, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. You are right now. Ajayraj890 (talk) 04:36, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]