Talk:Ghost boat investigation
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 19 February 2024. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ghost boat investigation article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
all of the article's sources are from one person
[edit]I added the 'unreliable sources' header, as all of the article's sources are from one person, who is clearly biased -- Nick429 00:52, 28 January 2016
- I think you're talking about Eric Reidy. A two second glance at the reference section shows that there are several articles that aren't from him proving your assertion that "all of the article's sources are from one person, who is clearly biased" is false. -- Esemono (talk) 07:47, 28 January 2016 (UTC)
"Ghost boat" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Ghost boat. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 November 12#Ghost boat until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 08:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class Disaster management articles
- Low-importance Disaster management articles
- Start-Class Shipwreck articles
- Low-importance Shipwreck articles
- Start-Class Africa articles
- Low-importance Africa articles
- Start-Class Eritrea articles
- Mid-importance Eritrea articles
- WikiProject Eritrea articles
- Start-Class Libya articles
- Mid-importance Libya articles
- WikiProject Libya articles
- WikiProject Africa articles