Talk:Getty Conservation Institute

Getty Conservation Institute has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 2, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Getty Conservation Institute/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: CrowzRSA 20:31, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review

The article is well structured and covers pretty much everything it needs, is referenced, and does not go against Wiki's neutral policy. There are no edit wars, as far as I am concerned. There were a few minor WP:MOS issues, but I have fixed those. I will now pass the article.

— Congratulations, CrowzRSA 21:45, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the review. Racepacket (talk) 22:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Getty Conservation Institute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120803081352/http://www.inxitu.com:80/new/pdf/NASA%20invention%20of%20the%20year%20award%20v2.pdf to http://www.inxitu.com/new/pdf/NASA%20invention%20of%20the%20year%20award%20v2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:04, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArchesProject.org missing

Major project of (open source) software and service development ARCHES is missing... I just added few entries in WikiData about it, but as non-expert and non native-speaker I hope others can contribute it to the page that is already marked as Good quality class article (not to mess it up ;) --Zblace (talk) 07:46, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]