Talk:Get a life (idiom)

Article title

The article is titled Get a Life. The article's opening word is Get a life, with emphasis. If noone objects soon, I'll just be bold and move it. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 20:12, 27 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're completely right. "Get a Life" would be an article about something with that title. "Get a life" would be about the common phrase, as this article is. Somegeek 19:43, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Moved, then. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:06, 1 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To get a life means to have lovely sex 49.179.4.82 (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced

The article lacks sources. This is a very serious problem. --SevenMass 17:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

provocative term

I think it should be mentioned somewhere this expression is provocative. --SevenMass 17:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

indicated as a taunt in the intro para dr.ef.tymac 17:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disambig

I suggest there should be a page for this article, and a disambig page. In fact, I'll make work of it right now. Creating the disambiguation page... --SevenMass 17:59, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

american folklore

I specifically remember hearing this phrase for the first time in the early 1980s (1982-83??) in a conversation between two people playfully insulting each other. The older person said to the younger one "Get a job" in the snide and derisive tone of voice that was common idiom back in the Reagan era. The younger person paused for a moment (as if searching for a response) and said back "Oh yeah, why don't *you* get a life. Everyone in earshot laughed uproariously. I specifically remember this incident as being the first time I heard this phrase. The reaction of others indicated it was probably the first time they had heard it also. Of course, this specific conversation was never documented for posterity, and I make no claim that this was the first time it was *ever* used. I do know that the incident predates the Shatner SNL (1987) usage. Documentation for this is sorely needed. dr.ef.tymac 17:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I may be the only one who cares about this, but for posterity sake, I suppose I should add this note. The earliest use of "get a life" (in its sense as a taunt) in google books is as follows:

Baby Anger - Page 48 by Sean O'Casey, Peter Hedges - 1986 ... Get a life, people of New Jersey! ...

there are some earlier "false positive hits" (such as "get a life sentence" "get a life preserver" and other non-taunt contexts). This evidence still leaves open the possibility that the conversation I heard was a unique initiation of this phrase. At least it predates anything I can find in print via google books. http://books.google.com/books?as_q=&num=100&btnG=Google+Search&as_epq=get+a+life&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_libcat=0&as_brr=0&as_vt=&as_auth=&as_pub=&as_drrb=c&as_miny=1980&as_maxy=1990&as_isbn= dr.ef.tymac 18:42, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

accurate?

I live in Indiana, have heard and used the idiom "get a life" hundreds of times, and never heard or used it in the context mentioned in the article. It means (to me) "You don't have a social life!" / "You aren't cool!" and has absolutely nothing to do with getting a job or making your way in the world. I guess, barring response, I'm going to change this article at some point.

Hello (unknown person who posted this comment), one aspect about commonly-used phrases and expressions is that they are subject to interpretation, have different meanings within different subcultures, and undergo changes in meaning with time. Consequently, your statement about accuracy (although it may be consistent with your personal experiences) has problems, because other people may experience it differently than you (not everyone who speaks English lives in Indiana). This is another reason why this article needs *more citations*. If you return to change the article, please seriously consider contributing some authoritative, researched material first. Thanks! dr.ef.tymac 04:29, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm German. Fortunately we don't use this stupid sentence in German. When I read it on the internet however it usually has exactly the meaning this Indian poster has mentioned. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.52.189.74 (talk) 22:50, 26 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Hehe, he's Indianan, not Indian... 64.252.19.39 19:16, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message

This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary.
The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.)
Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary.
Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there.

--CopyToWiktionaryBot 13:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for explaining

Is it necessary to indicate that William Shatner's use of the command in a Saturday Night Live sketch was "in jest"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.242.105.140 (talk) 23:30, 10 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relation to Star Trek?

This is categorized under "Star Trek sayings." Does it really have any connection to Star Trek, or did some vandal try to be funny by saying that Star Trek fanatics need to get a life? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gforce20 (talk • contribs) 04:47, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A very minor one. It says: 1987: The term was used by William Shatner's appearance in a 1987 episode of Saturday Night Live, in which he tells a group of trekkies to "get a life.". --Amalthea^Talk 10:34, 13 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

'Get a Life' building in GTA IV

There is a building called 'Get-a-Life' building in GTA IV, which is parodied after the Metlife Building in New York. Add that to the Uses list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MeNexus (talk • contribs) 11:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disparaging

I feel it should be noted that this phrase is one of disparagement. Never in my experience has any one kind said this to another or has this ever been said in kindness and compassion to the receiver of the phrase. It is in all accounts I know of meant to belittle and deliver a feeling of unworthiness in its recipient. (Crlinformative (talk) 05:55, 31 March 2016 (UTC))[reply]

Requested move 28 November 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Not moved (closed by non-admin page mover) Wug·a·po·des 03:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Get a life (idiom) → Get a life
Get a life → Get a Life

– Per WP:DIFFCAPS. This is the primary topic for the lowercase version. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 11:41, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose – DIFFCAPS doesn't suggest that a minor case difference is usually enough to disambiguate; quite the contrary. Dicklyon (talk) 06:09, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – Is this a relentless drive to shorten article titles? Shortness is an avantage, but must be weighed against reduced searchability/clarity for our readers. Tony (talk) 11:07, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Inclined to support in this case, not per nom but per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. The phrase itself and the concept behind it is a pop-culture phenomenon of its own, with a great deal of currency, and has had far more cultural impact than any work listed in the disambiguation page. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 17:53, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No evidence that idiom is much more likely to be sought than all the other uses combined, and the other uses are very likely to be sought in lower case so this is not a good application of DIFFCAPS. --В²C ☎ 23:33, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.