Talk:Gerry Duggan (writer)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gerry Duggan (writer) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 December 2016 by reviewer Anne Delong (talk · contribs).

Comics

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).

Which photo is a better choice for the Infobox?

1
2
3

Does the community prefer the kind of photo with shadows (2 and 3), or without (1)? I'd like to hear your opinions. Nightscream (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1 or 2 but not 3. Slight preference to 1 maybe, but as indicated, would be fine with 2 as well. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:57, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'd prefer 3, but I'm perfectly happy with 2. Although now I've noticed that 3 has a shiny forehead, so I'm less inclined to that one.--Tenebrae (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I prefer option 1 for the angle more than the lighting. Option 3 is also a good photo. The angle of option 2 does not appeal to me. Argento Surfer (talk) 19:00, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
3 is good. Decent color depth, good composition, less shine off his head, and the portrait is better distinguished from the background than 1. Guy (Help!) 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

* 3! ...but the others are pretty good too. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 19:32, 15 May 2018 (UTC) Changing to #1. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

When you click on the images, 1 is the best one in terms of being able to see the face clearly and more neutrally. The background is not good, especially in thumbnail form, but the article is about the person and not the background. Mkdw ^talk 19:39, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
First choice, 1: a bit dark in the foreground, but the angle is good and the subject's hair doesn't disappear into the background. Second choice, 2: acceptable angle but the hair disappears and there's too much shine in the center of forehead. Distant third choice, 3: same as for 2 but unacceptable angle for image at right of page. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 02:24, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

True, true. Good points! I'm changing my pick. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose 3 as it is inferior to the other two. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 19:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1 - Yes, definitely 1, not 3. Definitely, definitely. But 2 is okayish. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 23:31, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1 is my favorite, especially if the background is blurred or blocked out. Lexein (talk) 04:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
1, 3, 2 in order of preference starting with most liked. I would like the background made darker on 1, though; I could do it if people want it. Alden Loveshade (talk) 21:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not currently writing Deadpool?

I believe Duggan is not currently writing Deadpool, and the paragraph in the Career section could be updated. I will make the edit if no one objects. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk • contribs) 23:59, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]