Talk:German torpedo boat T24

German torpedo boat T24 has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 15, 2019. (Reviewed version).

A fact from German torpedo boat T24 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 28 November 2018 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that after being damaged twice by Allied ships, escorting a blockade runner, and hitting two mines, the German torpedo boat T24 was sunk by air-launched rockets?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2018/November. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/German torpedo boat T24.

Wikipedia

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Military history: Maritime / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:German torpedo boat T24/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Zawed (talk · contribs) 23:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this one, comments to follow in due course. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 23:50, 4 January 2019 (UTC) This looks in good shape. My comments:[reply]

"On 3 July T24 and her sister T25 departed for Western France." The following sentence mentions British coastal artillery, so for better context, I think it should be mentioned they were (presumably) going via the English Channel.
- It's mentioned in the lede.
  - But the lede is supposed to be a summary of the body of the article, and it is not mentioned in the body. Zawed (talk) 08:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Added, but I'd have thought that the mentions of French ports on the Channel visited en route would have informed the reader that they weren't taking the long route past Scotland.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 13:30, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
"through the Bay."; specify Bay of Biscay here, it is the first time it is mentioned.
- See above
"threw spray over their forward guns that made them difficult to operate."; replace that with and
- I think "which" works even better
"Korvettenkapitän Franz Kohlauf"; presumably commander of 4th Flotilla. If so, mention this.
"The German ships had been spotted first..."; This starts off quite a long sentence, consider breaking it up.
- I've separated the bit covering T24's inaction with a semi-colon
"37 mm anti-aircraft guns"; shouldn't this be 3.7 cm for consistency with the armament of the T24 (I assume; the way this sentence is structured suggests you are referring to the exchange of fire so the 40mm is British).
Referring to the citations, it looks like you use the year of pub to differentiate between the two Whitley refs - but there are some that don't have the year.
- Good catch
No dupe links
No dab links
External links check out OK
Image tags look fine

That's my comments complete. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 06:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- Thanks for the thorough review. Let me know if my changes are satisfactory.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:08, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Zawed: just checking you haven't forgot about this. L293D (☎ • ✎) 00:26, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
    - Looking good, I've queried one point though. Zawed (talk) 08:19, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
      - OK, passing as GA now. Cheers, Zawed (talk) 08:29, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]