Jump to content

Talk:German battleship Bismarck/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jim Sweeney (talk) 07:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Comments

[edit]
  1. There are four disamb links according to the checker Arcona,Brest,Halifax,Scuttle
  2. The displacement in the text and inf box do not match 50,300 t (49,500 long tons) to 50,900 t (50,100 LT; 56,100 ST)
  3. References for book printed locations we have Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press - Annapolis: Naval Institute Press - Annapolis: United States Naval Institute Press
Good work just the three minor points. Jim Sweeney (talk) 09:31, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Jim, they should all be fixed now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:20, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]